 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible schrieb:
> In particular, Code 39 uses thin and thick bars and spaces. On my
> barcode, thick is twice the size of thin, but on the real barcode it
> seems to be something like 2.5 or something. (Obviously, you can't
> easily represent this as a sequence of 1s and 0s. But hey, that's the
> Real World for ya...)
As I mentioned earlier, Code 39 doesn't require a particular
narrow-to-wide ratio. There may be maximum and minimum limits, but
anything in between those is fair game.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Oh, and I finally found out what all those zig-zags are for:
Kewl. I like how MSWord gives you an option to print that on envelopes when
you print envelopes. I wonder if it uses the right barcode for the right
country? I never tried it.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> In particular, Code 39 uses thin and thick bars and spaces. On my
>> barcode, thick is twice the size of thin, but on the real barcode it
>> seems to be something like 2.5 or something. (Obviously, you can't
>> easily represent this as a sequence of 1s and 0s. But hey, that's the
>> Real World for ya...)
>
> As I mentioned earlier, Code 39 doesn't require a particular
> narrow-to-wide ratio. There may be maximum and minimum limits, but
> anything in between those is fair game.
...which is probably why it's been printed at 2.5. That would mean it
definitely falls within the limits, regardless of print tolerence.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:4aeaf3f8$1@news.povray.org...
> Here, have a cookie:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58_s6r7PaKo
>
> This is what happens when you play with a simple non-linear dynamical
> system. (It represents about a day's worth of computer time, BTW.)
I haven't been able to see it yet, unless of course it's 30 seconds of a
black screen with a white caption reading, "an error has occurred, try again
later", or words to that effect. Ah well...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Captain Jack wrote:
> I haven't been able to see it yet, unless of course it's 30 seconds of a
> black screen with a white caption reading, "an error has occurred, try again
> later", or words to that effect. Ah well...
Damn, after this much of a buildup, this is going to be *so* anticlimatic...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
