 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:43:32 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:24:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> You need to get an “internet radio” the pause feature is useful. :)
>>
>> I've got an old Linksys one, but it's ability to tune in 'net radio
>> stations is somewhat limited (the model is discontinued).
>>
>> Might be something to look into if I get a bonus this year.
>>
>> Jim
>
> The fun thing to do is to have a FM radio in one room tuned into the
> same digital station, in another room. There is a time delay on the
> digital one so you get some strange effects. :)
That would be interesting.... :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:01:39 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> I want a Ctrl Z for RL
>> ^Z for undo? Or ^z for EOF? Because we already have the latter.
>
> LOL, forgot about that one. :-)
>
Me too
^g^g^g ^g^g^g^g^g <UK ring tone> :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:23:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> I want a Ctrl Z for RL
>>> Suspend, or undo version? ;-)
>>>
>>> Jim
>> Undo will do for me ;)
>
> I'd take that as well. :-)
>
^z ^z ^z Now I'm 19 yo ;)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> Yeah, I've not started looking yet to see what kinds of bitrates we get
> here, but one of the problems with the move from analog to digital - in
> general - is a loss of quality and "pixelation" of the sound. It becomes
> very apparent at low bitrates (natch), but a trained ear can hear it at
> high bitrates, too.
>
Not much of a problem with speech but don’t believe that they will keep
the initial bitrate for ever :(
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:51:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:01:39 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> I want a Ctrl Z for RL
>>> ^Z for undo? Or ^z for EOF? Because we already have the latter.
>>
>> LOL, forgot about that one. :-)
>>
>>
> Me too
>
> ^g^g^g ^g^g^g^g^g <UK ring tone> :-)
LOL, I may have to set my phone to use that. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:54:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:23:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> I want a Ctrl Z for RL
>>>> Suspend, or undo version? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>> Undo will do for me ;)
>>
>> I'd take that as well. :-)
>>
>>
> ^z ^z ^z Now I'm 19 yo ;)
That means you're 21? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:58:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I've not started looking yet to see what kinds of bitrates we get
>> here, but one of the problems with the move from analog to digital - in
>> general - is a loss of quality and "pixelation" of the sound. It
>> becomes very apparent at low bitrates (natch), but a trained ear can
>> hear it at high bitrates, too.
>>
>>
> Not much of a problem with speech but don’t believe that they will keep
> the initial bitrate for ever :(
Yeah, speech wouldn't have much of a problem with lower bitrates, Now
I'm curious, though, going to have to check the local stations.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:54:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:23:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I want a Ctrl Z for RL
>>>>> Suspend, or undo version? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim
>>>> Undo will do for me ;)
>>> I'd take that as well. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> ^z ^z ^z Now I'm 19 yo ;)
>
> That means you're 21? ;-)
>
Yes! (Arrg! My nose!) :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:51:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:01:39 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> I want a Ctrl Z for RL
>>>> ^Z for undo? Or ^z for EOF? Because we already have the latter.
>>> LOL, forgot about that one. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> Me too
>>
>> ^g^g^g ^g^g^g^g^g <UK ring tone> :-)
>
> LOL, I may have to set my phone to use that. ;-)
>
I remember when I was about ^z ^z ^z +2 yo I made a tape loop for a
teletype 33 with that had that sequence. It sounded ok over the noise in
the factory. :twisted:
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:58:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I've not started looking yet to see what kinds of bitrates we get
>>> here, but one of the problems with the move from analog to digital - in
>>> general - is a loss of quality and "pixelation" of the sound. It
>>> becomes very apparent at low bitrates (natch), but a trained ear can
>>> hear it at high bitrates, too.
>>>
>>>
>> Not much of a problem with speech but don’t believe that they will keep
>> the initial bitrate for ever :(
>
> Yeah, speech wouldn't have much of a problem with lower bitrates, Now
> I'm curious, though, going to have to check the local stations.
>
> Jim
>:)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
