![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Why does this remind me vividly of The Sims 2?
I don't know. Does The Sims 2 feature horrific colour schemes and badly
drawn stairs?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/12/2009 2:17 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Please tell me it doesn't use those colours. o_O
>
Well, no. It's not as fancy as yours. It comes in a nice shade of beige.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Please tell me it doesn't use those colours. o_O
>>
>
> Well, no. It's not as fancy as yours. It comes in a nice shade of beige.
Ah, OK.
I was actually purposefully going for a retro look, if only because back
in the old days straight lines were cool.
(The colours were so I can tell WTF I'm looking at while I model it.
SketchUp isn't very easy to navigate...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible escreveu:
>> something it really isn't designed for. If you really want to design
>> stuff like that phone with nice smooth surfaces then put the effort in
>> to learning something like Blender rather than SketchUp.
>
> I wonder - is there anything that SketchUp *is* the right tool for?
> Every single time I mention it, everybody says I should use Blender
> instead...
It's much better at architectural creations than Blender. Blender and
other polygonal-based modellers are not the right tool for product
design either. That truly demands fine and precise NURBS tools.
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> It's much better at architectural creations than Blender.
http://www.wonderhowto.com/how-to/video/how-to-model-a-house-in-blender-3d-242095/
Which is not to say Blender makes it easy, but it's not *too* bad.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> It's much better at architectural creations than Blender.
>
> http://www.wonderhowto.com/how-to/video/how-to-model-a-house-in-blender-3d-242095/
>
>
> Which is not to say Blender makes it easy, but it's not *too* bad.
I've learned to use that technique too. Sketchup still has a large edge
over it.
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> I've learned to use that technique too. Sketchup still has a large edge
> over it.
I see what you did there. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |