http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/c49f/?cpg=103H6
Apparently this is legal. Though I can't think of a single reason you'd
want to buy one other than to do illegal stuff...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/c49f/?cpg=103H6> > Apparently this is legal. Though I can't think of a single reason you'd > want to buy one other than to do illegal stuff...>
Spy on your kids,
Gather evidence on that employee that's been divulging company secrets.
Two examples of "legitimate" uses.
--
~Mike
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:50:59 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/c49f/?cpg=103H6> > Apparently this is legal. Though I can't think of a single reason you'd> want to buy one other than to do illegal stuff...
I'd go with Mike's example of catching someone stealing intellectual
property. I'd love to be able to put something like this on remote exam
hosts - would help me know for certain that they're not using Internet
resources for their closed-book exam.
Jim
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Spy on your kids,> Gather evidence on that employee that's been divulging company secrets.
I think it would be cheaper to simply use a software keylogger. Kids
and most employees won't be none the wiser, and they won't get suspicious
if they happen to look at the keyboard connection plug.
--
- Warp
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:17:48 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:>> Spy on your kids,>> Gather evidence on that employee that's been divulging company secrets.> > I think it would be cheaper to simply use a software keylogger. Kids> and most employees won't be none the wiser, and they won't get> suspicious if they happen to look at the keyboard connection plug.
But a software keylogger might be less admissible in court...though I
don't know why.
Jim
