From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 8 Sep 2009 12:27:00
Message: <4aa685d4@news.povray.org>
Chambers wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:>> I don't recall the monolith being on the moon... Then again, I have >> slept a few times since seeing the movie, so maybe I'm wrong.> > That was actually the whole point of the section between the Apes and > Discovery.
Now I'll have to watch it again... agh.
--
~Mike
From: Chambers
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 8 Sep 2009 22:05:29
Message: <4aa70d69$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Chambers wrote:>> Mike Raiford wrote:>>> I don't recall the monolith being on the moon... Then again, I have >>> slept a few times since seeing the movie, so maybe I'm wrong.>>>> That was actually the whole point of the section between the Apes and >> Discovery.> > Now I'll have to watch it again... agh.>
Is that a bad thing? :)
...Chambers
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 9 Sep 2009 11:23:12
Message: <4aa7c860@news.povray.org>
Chambers wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:>> Chambers wrote:>>> Mike Raiford wrote:>>>> I don't recall the monolith being on the moon... Then again, I have >>>> slept a few times since seeing the movie, so maybe I'm wrong.>>>>>> That was actually the whole point of the section between the Apes and >>> Discovery.>>>> Now I'll have to watch it again... agh.>>> > Is that a bad thing? :)> > ...Chambers
Not at all, but lamenting my failed memory...
--
~Mike
