 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Especially for users of LaTeX
http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/14/09 11:17, Darren New wrote:
> Especially for users of LaTeX
>
> http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
Definitely awesome.
--
For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Impressive!
Darren New wrote:
> Especially for users of LaTeX
>
> http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/14/09 11:17, Darren New wrote:
> Especially for users of LaTeX
>
> http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
Seems to fail for h-bar (h/(2*pi))
--
... OS/2 VirusScan - "Windows found: Remove it? (Y/y)"
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neeum Zawan wrote:
> On 07/14/09 11:17, Darren New wrote:
>> Especially for users of LaTeX
>>
>> http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
>
> Seems to fail for h-bar (h/(2*pi))
I tried it and it worked for me. It seems to occasionally re-organize
things after it first displays the results, so it might help to wait
longer for a better result (or be careful with penmanship?).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/14/09 21:24, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>> Seems to fail for h-bar (h/(2*pi))
>
> I tried it and it worked for me. It seems to occasionally re-organize
> things after it first displays the results, so it might help to wait
> longer for a better result (or be careful with penmanship?).
Hmm...working now. I'm sure I tried it 4 or 5 times before.
--
... OS/2 VirusScan - "Windows found: Remove it? (Y/y)"
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm, interesting...
Using this tool, I was able to quickly determine that most of the
symbols I can't find, it can't find either. However, there were a few.
(E.g., there *is* a symbol for the degree sign, in spite of this not
being documented anywhere.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neeum Zawan wrote:
> Hmm...working now. I'm sure I tried it 4 or 5 times before.
Since it talks about training data, I imagine it's improving over time once
advertised and released.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/15/09 10:46, Darren New wrote:
> Neeum Zawan wrote:
>> Hmm...working now. I'm sure I tried it 4 or 5 times before.
>
> Since it talks about training data, I imagine it's improving over time
> once advertised and released.
That was fast!
--
... OS/2 VirusScan - "Windows found: Remove it? (Y/y)"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Especially for users of LaTeX
>
> http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
>
It SUCKS!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pterandon/3725749793/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
