 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Oh, *only*... :-P
>
> Yes. After all, it's AFAIK the cheapest non-Canon CMOS -based SLR. At
> least it's the cheapest CMOS-based Nikon SLR.
I thought that was the D20...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Oh, *only*... :-P
>>
>> Yes. After all, it's AFAIK the cheapest non-Canon CMOS -based SLR. At
>> least it's the cheapest CMOS-based Nikon SLR.
>
> I thought that was the D20...
>
Can you link specs? I've never heard of such model, Nikon's web-pages
won't show it, neither does Digiwowo.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:39:32 +0200, Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
> My new camera is here. It seems very ... manual compared to my other
> cameras. Why do I need three separate switches to turn on and off
> autofocus? Why do you need to be careful to switch off vibration
> reduction before turning off the camera?
I guess it does not have an "intuitive interface".
http://basicinstructions.net/?p=878
Seriously though, do they actually tell you to disable VR before shutdown?
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:47:09 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>> Oh, *only*... :-P
>>>
>>> Yes. After all, it's AFAIK the cheapest non-Canon CMOS -based SLR. At
>>> least it's the cheapest CMOS-based Nikon SLR.
>>
>> I thought that was the D20...
>>
>
> Can you link specs? I've never heard of such model, Nikon's web-pages
> won't show it, neither does Digiwowo.
There were some rumors a few years ago that Nikon would name their coming
model "D20". They did not.
There was a Nikon D200, but that was not a low-end model.
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Yes. After all, it's AFAIK the cheapest non-Canon CMOS -based SLR. At
>>> least it's the cheapest CMOS-based Nikon SLR.
>> I thought that was the D20...
>
> Can you link specs? I've never heard of such model, Nikon's web-pages
> won't show it, neither does Digiwowo.
It appears I have my model numbers wrong. It was the D40.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Fredrik Eriksson wrote:
>
> There was a Nikon D200, but that was not a low-end model.
>
It wasn't CMOS either.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> It appears I have my model numbers wrong. It was the D40.
>
D40 is CCD, not CMOS.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> D40 is CCD, not CMOS.
Oh, OK then. Does that make some kind of difference?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> D40 is CCD, not CMOS.
>
> Oh, OK then. Does that make some kind of difference?
>
Yes, it does :). CCD makes more noise in dark.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> ...isn't that... um... absurdly expensive?
$1150 or so, with a nice lens included. I have several lenses left over from
my old film camera, too, which makes it nice.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Insanity is a small city on the western
border of the State of Mind.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
