|
 |
Warp wrote:
> However, if Ocaml lacks such capabilities, that's hardly C++'s problem.
Indeed, I think that was specifically the point of the article in the first
place. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Warp escreveu:
> nemesis <nam### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> Scala on the
>> JVM, outpacing OCaml. That's what really stroke me as odd.
>
> If the JVM performs JIT-compiling, I don't see the problem...
JIT-compiling doesn't beat g++ compiling in that benchmark, nor do I
understand quite why it should beat OCaml either -- the author mentions
poor OCaml float performance.
I'm not an OCaml programmer, which is why I asked Mr. Harrop for some
insight. I only knew, based on more than one source, that it's capable
of very C++-like performance. caught off-guard...
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
