 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So, if you enjoyed watching the video on YouTube, now you can try
watching the high-res original. I just finished rerendering it:
http://download.orphi.me.uk/Video/Chaos1-H.264-5000.avi
I rendered it at 3200x1800 and then downsampled it to 1600x900 to give
it 2x antialiasing. (Downsampled using Lanczos resampling.) The result
was then H.264 encoded at 5,000 kb/sec average bitrate.
Obviously you'll need to find some sort of H.264 decoder to be able to
enjoy this, but if you can track down some software that will do it...
it looks pretty sweet, man. And only about 16 MB to download.
Render time was under 4 hours. Integrated with 4th-order Runge-Kutta
using an adaptive step size based on Scott's suggestion to use the
variation between the four slope estimates to decide when to subdivide.
Enjoy, people...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> So, if you enjoyed watching the video on YouTube, now you can try
> watching the high-res original. I just finished rerendering it:
>
> http://download.orphi.me.uk/Video/Chaos1-H.264-5000.avi
>
> Enjoy, people...
Wow, this generated a surge of interest...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Wow, this generated a surge of interest...
Yes. That's always a nice thing.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> Wow, this generated a surge of interest...
>
> Yes. That's always a nice thing.
Isn't it just? *sigh*
Maybe when I get my parser working and release the code for other people
to play with... [don't hold your breath]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> [don't hold your breath]
Don't worry, I won't. :)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> [don't hold your breath]
>
> Don't worry, I won't. :)
Oh good.
I should maybe point out that I meant "don't bother waiting for people
to be impressed when the code is released" rather than "don't bother
waiting for the code to be released", but anyway...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Wow, this generated a surge of interest...
I liked it.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> I liked it.
Heh. Glad somebody did. It took long enough to upload...
(It *is* impressive in high resolution though, eh?)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
