|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:53:54 -0300, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:25:36 -0400, Warp wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>> I usually chalk it up to cultural/language differences
>>> In my case I'd say it's not so much about cultural or language
>>> differences
>>> as much as inexperience in social interaction.
>>>
>>> When 90% of your social interaction happens through the internet, it
>>> sometimes shows.
>>
>> That's a possibility I hadn't considered. :-)
>
> Hey, you're dealing with geeks here, don't you know? The most common
> close social interaction we get is from the pizza delivery guy. :)
Yeah, but as a geek myself, it's been a long time since I personally had
trouble with social interactions with "normals" (if you know what I
mean). I sometimes forget that the tact filter goes on the other way
when talking with fellow geeks. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:53:54 -0300, nemesis wrote:
>
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:25:36 -0400, Warp wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>> I usually chalk it up to cultural/language differences
>>>> In my case I'd say it's not so much about cultural or language
>>>> differences
>>>> as much as inexperience in social interaction.
>>>>
>>>> When 90% of your social interaction happens through the internet, it
>>>> sometimes shows.
>>> That's a possibility I hadn't considered. :-)
>> Hey, you're dealing with geeks here, don't you know? The most common
>> close social interaction we get is from the pizza delivery guy. :)
>
> Yeah, but as a geek myself, it's been a long time since I personally had
> trouble with social interactions with "normals" (if you know what I
> mean).
Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 19-4-2009 7:02, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:53:54 -0300, nemesis wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:25:36 -0400, Warp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>> I usually chalk it up to cultural/language differences
>>>>> In my case I'd say it's not so much about cultural or language
>>>>> differences
>>>>> as much as inexperience in social interaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> When 90% of your social interaction happens through the internet, it
>>>>> sometimes shows.
>>>> That's a possibility I hadn't considered. :-)
>>> Hey, you're dealing with geeks here, don't you know? The most common
>>> close social interaction we get is from the pizza delivery guy. :)
>>
>> Yeah, but as a geek myself, it's been a long time since I personally
>> had trouble with social interactions with "normals" (if you know what
>> I mean).
>
> Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
Are we?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] nospam-gmailcom> wrote:
> Married geeks
Isn't that an oxymoron? ;)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:02:42 -0300, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:53:54 -0300, nemesis wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:25:36 -0400, Warp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>> I usually chalk it up to cultural/language differences
>>>>> In my case I'd say it's not so much about cultural or language
>>>>> differences
>>>>> as much as inexperience in social interaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> When 90% of your social interaction happens through the internet,
>>>>> it
>>>>> sometimes shows.
>>>> That's a possibility I hadn't considered. :-)
>>> Hey, you're dealing with geeks here, don't you know? The most common
>>> close social interaction we get is from the pizza delivery guy. :)
>>
>> Yeah, but as a geek myself, it's been a long time since I personally
>> had trouble with social interactions with "normals" (if you know what I
>> mean).
>
> Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
Even when it's two geeks who have gotten married? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:10:45 -0400, Warp wrote:
> nemesis <nam### [at] nospam-gmailcom> wrote:
>> Married geeks
>
> Isn't that an oxymoron? ;)
I'll ask my wife. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:02:42 -0300, nemesis wrote:
>> Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
>
> Even when it's two geeks who have gotten married? ;-)
whoa! What happened with all that talk of attracting opposites? :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
>
> Even when it's two geeks who have gotten married? ;-)
Come ON people! We all know geek girls are a myth created to give false
hope to poor souls such as myself. :-/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:41:39 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
>>
>> Even when it's two geeks who have gotten married? ;-)
>
> Come ON people! We all know geek girls are a myth created to give false
> hope to poor souls such as myself. :-/
My wife is terribly offended that you think she's not a geek.... ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> Married geeks are as normal as it can get. ;)
> >
> > Even when it's two geeks who have gotten married? ;-)
>
> Come ON people! We all know geek girls are a myth created to give false
> hope to poor souls such as myself. :-/
Now come on. I'm not sure that's true, mathematically speaking. Now we'd need
to make some modifications for location and geekiness, but given a large enough
population, there just might be a chance:
http://ericherboso.com/blog/2009/03/finding-a-girlfriend-drake-equation-style/
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |