 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> Most of those PCs resources get wasted anyway since most of them don't
> use them to 100% capacity
That would be true if PCs consumed the exact same amount of energy
regardless of what you are doing with them. Of course that's not the case.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:04:25 -0400, Saul Luizaga wrote:
>> With that attitude you really aren't inviting people to join...
> Man, if he could *at least* visit the website... Jesus...
Put the shovel down, man.....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> I don't know about CFLs, but our house has several "energy saving"
> lighting units. The problem is, there's a 20 minute delay between
> turning them on and being able to see where you're going...
Not an issue with CFL's.
--
OK, so what's the speed of dark?
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Global Statistics
> Statistics Last Updated: 3/9/09 12:05:59 (UTC) [8 hour(s) ago]
> Totals:
> Members 431,866
> Devices 1,200,203
> Total Run Time 223,417 years (As 1 PC running 24/7)
> Points Generated 100,949,508,634
> Results Returned 249,504,379
> Averages:
> Run Time Per Calendar Day (y:d:h:m:s) 136:327:16:15:32
> Run Time Per Result (y:d:h:m:s) 0:000:07:50:39
> Points Per Hour of Run Time 51.58
> Points Per Calendar Day 61,856,316.56
> Points Per Result 404.60
> Results Per Calendar Day 152,882.59
> Yesterday:
> Total Run Time (y:d:h:m:s) 238:250:03:58:30
> Points Generated 182,127,010
> Results Returned 362,215
>
> 248.879 TeraFLOPS (http://boincstats.com/stats/project_graph.php?pr=wcg)
>
> This stats say you are wrong and don't have clue what you are talking
I can tell you didn't understand what the person you're responding to said.
> about , as you don't care putting a decent nick or your name, just
> "somebody", you don't care about altruistic deeds. But your conscience
It's a very bad idea to take something you don't understand and assume
the worst.
--
OK, so what's the speed of dark?
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga wrote:
> Actually I gave enough info and people that ask "Why should I?" is I
> don't care about selfless things but if you talk/write to me enough I
> MIGHT do it, if they do, they do for a little time then "suddenly" they
> get "bothered" by it, so they MUST uninstall the damn thing. Is for
> Humanity benefit, the more we are helping the better, you don't know if
> you're gonna develop cancer or another disease in the future, so I don't
> know HOW some pèople find this to be WRONG, I just don't get it, IMO
> distributed computing for helping Humanity is best thing ever build
> after computers them selves
If you were behind this initiative, I'd already have decided not to
join. Your attitude is one I've seen in plenty of voluntary work. If
those people don't leave, other volunteers do.
--
OK, so what's the speed of dark?
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> Most of those PCs resources get wasted anyway since most of them don't
>> use them to 100% capacity
>
> That would be true if PCs consumed the exact same amount of energy
> regardless of what you are doing with them. Of course that's not the case.
>
True, I think I should had specified that was only resource wise.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:04:25 -0400, Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> Saul Luizaga wrote:
>>>> This stats say you are wrong and don't have clue what you are talking
>>>> about , as you don't care putting a decent nick or your name, just
>>>> "somebody", you don't care about altruistic deeds. But your conscience
>>>> don't leave you alone so you have to post something to make it shut up
>>>> and convince yourself that everything you do is always best. Nice...
>>>> ironically people like you are first to cry out for help when something
>>>> bad happens.
>>> With that attitude you really aren't inviting people to join...
>> Man, if he could *at least* visit the website... Jesus...
>
> Don't you mean would?
My mistake, non-native English "speacker" here, you would find I make
errors on my post because of this, I eventually find them myself and I
try to self-correct me, but eventually will happen. Thanks for the
correction tho.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:04:25 -0400, Saul Luizaga wrote:
>
>>> With that attitude you really aren't inviting people to join...
>> Man, if he could *at least* visit the website... Jesus...
>
> Put the shovel down, man.....
>
> Jim
I don't understand that expression, you mean I should calm down? well it
has a degree of irritation that SOMEBODY writes/speaks something he
doesn't know and starts assuming too much and finally based on those
false assumptions saying, "is wrong/bad", don't you think?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> I don't know about CFLs, but our house has several "energy saving"
>> lighting units. The problem is, there's a 20 minute delay between
>> turning them on and being able to see where you're going...
>
> Not an issue with CFL's.
It used to be, when they first came out. Nowadays they've gotten better, and
it's only a couple of minutes, or even close to instant.
I remember my wife calling me (when working from home) asking me to turn on
the kitchen lights when she left work, so we could see to cook when she got
home. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
unable to read this, even at arm's length."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Point taken Mr. Warp.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
