I StumbleUpon'ed this: 
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-websites-to-make-you-a-photoshop-ninja/
I found the first image rather ironic (and possible quite illegal, but at least 
they didn't remove Gilles' copyright-tag, they just made it unreadably small)

Similarly, I found this: 
http://www.denofgeek.com/captainsblog/49152/the_martin_anderson_column_a_new_future_for_blakes_7.html
Where they used an image I made 
(http://www.povplace.com/gallery/SciFi%20-%20Blakes%207/12.jpg), removed my 
name, added the Blake's 7 logo and implied it's a preview for the Blake's 7 
remake... quite flattering, although I would have liked some credit of course :(

cu!
-- 
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x)            // ZK http://www.povplace.com

Post a reply to this message

"Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] povplacecom> wrote:
> I StumbleUpon'ed this:
> http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-websites-to-make-you-a-photoshop-ninja/
> I found the first image rather ironic (and possible quite illegal, but at least
> they didn't remove Gilles' copyright-tag, they just made it unreadably small)

How insulting.  What about this one:

http://mathpaint.blogspot.com/2007/02/fractal-temple.html

Unknown author?  He's either not trying or just feigning ignorance.

 - Ricky

Post a reply to this message

I have found a good tool for finding unauthorized usage of your images. Its 
a pattern-based image search. Try it out with some POV hall of fame images.
http://tineye.com/


-- 

Post a reply to this message

On 2/8/2009 8:15 AM, triple_r wrote:
> "Zeger Knaepen"<zeg### [at] povplacecom>  wrote:
>> I StumbleUpon'ed this:
>> http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-websites-to-make-you-a-photoshop-ninja/
>> I found the first image rather ironic (and possible quite illegal, but at least
>> they didn't remove Gilles' copyright-tag, they just made it unreadably small)
>
> How insulting.  What about this one:
>
> http://mathpaint.blogspot.com/2007/02/fractal-temple.html
>
> Unknown author?  He's either not trying or just feigning ignorance.
>
>   - Ricky
>

Wow - it's right on the image!

-- 
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com

Post a reply to this message

On 8-2-2009 20:37, Chambers wrote:
> On 2/8/2009 8:15 AM, triple_r wrote:
>> "Zeger Knaepen"<zeg### [at] povplacecom>  wrote:
>>> I StumbleUpon'ed this:
>>> http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-websites-to-make-you-a-photoshop-ninja/
>>> I found the first image rather ironic (and possible quite illegal, 
>>> but at least
>>> they didn't remove Gilles' copyright-tag, they just made it 
>>> unreadably small)
>>
>> How insulting.  What about this one:
>>
>> http://mathpaint.blogspot.com/2007/02/fractal-temple.html
>>
>> Unknown author?  He's either not trying or just feigning ignorance.
>>
>>   - Ricky
>>
> 
> Wow - it's right on the image!
> 
Perhaps he means that it is not by a known author, like Shakespeare or 
Pratchett or Marquez. Then again, I don't think they are very well known 
for their raytracing, so why did he expect that?

Post a reply to this message

"triple_r" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Unknown author?

I guess the proper thing to do would have been to speak up and let him know,
rather than just complain.  Thanks, Mr. Johnson.

 - Ricky

Post a reply to this message

"Halbert" <hal### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I have found a good tool for finding unauthorized usage of your images. Its
> a pattern-based image search. Try it out with some POV hall of fame images.

That's pretty neat.  It seems to work pretty well too, although I'm surprised
some of those don't actually have more hits.  Seems like the kind of thing
Google would be very interested in, especially with such a big image index.

 - Ricky

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
>
> Perhaps he means that it is not by a known author, like Shakespeare or
> Pratchett or Marquez. Then again, I don't think they are very well known
> for their raytracing, so why did he expect that?

No, he doesn't. Now there's a comment from Christopher himself and he's
granted thanks for pointing out the author.

He *might* have ment that the signature on the image ain't 100% sure
identification, but I doubt even that.

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Halbert <hal### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> http://tineye.com/

  Seems like islamonline.net is not concerned about such mundane things like
copyright...
http://www.islamonline.net/english/Contemporary/2002/08/Article02a.shtml

  (From here: http://warp.povusers.org/pics/Landscape.jpg )

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen wrote:
> 
> No, he doesn't. Now there's a comment from Christopher himself and he's
> granted thanks for pointing out the author.
> 

I was blind but now I can see!

Seriously, I did read that my eyes crossed oslt. The comment is from
Greg M. Johnson, not Christopher himself.

> -Aero

-Aero, who opened hes eyes.

Post a reply to this message