|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> - It appears that "solid state harddrives" are now reaching useful
>> sizes and sane pricing levels. (E.g., when I first looked at this it
>>
> Only problems are: a) slow (faster isn't much faster, and costs double),
> and b) limited number of "write cycles". And, no, the 250GB one is not
> $2/GB. lol
http://www.ebuyer.com/product/152605
As for "slow"... presumably the win is the massive decrease in seek
time, rather than sequential transfer speed. (I think I saw a benchmark
somewhere... but I bet I can't find it now.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Hey, do you remember the old PCs that used to have a "turbo button" on
> the front? Why the **** would you ever turn that off?! o_O
There was one thing they were good for: Older games ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> > why don't they just make cases out of copper??)
>
> Too heavy and very soft.
.... and maybe also more expensive? I mean, people actually begin to steal cables
from construction sites... and not by the spool, but by the yard...
And then I guess it's also heavier than Aluminum, which I'd suspect to be the
main reason for gamers to get an Alu casing: Carrying it to the LAN party.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> There were TSRs written for MS-DOS that did just that for machines that
> had faster processors but no turbo button. :-)
Yeah, but they used up precious memory, which the Turbo didn't ;)
In addition, the TSRs would make the system run a bit less smoothly.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
>
> And then I guess it's also heavier than Aluminum, which I'd suspect to be the
> main reason for gamers to get an Alu casing: Carrying it to the LAN party.
>
Magnesium. The ultimate in portability. My camera still blows me away,
the chassis is a Mg alloy and feels like plastic.
Of course, I don't know how well Mg deals with heat.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:29:29 -0500, clipka wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> There were TSRs written for MS-DOS that did just that for machines that
>> had faster processors but no turbo button. :-)
>
> Yeah, but they used up precious memory, which the Turbo didn't ;)
Absolutely. Managing TSRs was always a lot of fun. (OK, maybe not).
> In addition, the TSRs would make the system run a bit less smoothly.
They could, but my experience was generally good. Unless the TSR was
poorly written, in which case it got used only once. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:46:14 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
> clipka wrote:
>
>
>> And then I guess it's also heavier than Aluminum, which I'd suspect to
>> be the main reason for gamers to get an Alu casing: Carrying it to the
>> LAN party.
>>
>>
> Magnesium. The ultimate in portability. My camera still blows me away,
> the chassis is a Mg alloy and feels like plastic.
>
> Of course, I don't know how well Mg deals with heat.
I just had a picture flash through my mind (if you'll pardon the pun) of
a case made out of pure Magnesium. In my mind's eye, it didn't last very
long, but it was spectacular. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> They could, but my experience was generally good. Unless the TSR was
> poorly written, in which case it got used only once. :-)
>
Sidekick comes to mind as a particularly troublesome TSR.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> I just had a picture flash through my mind (if you'll pardon the pun) of
> a case made out of pure Magnesium. In my mind's eye, it didn't last very
> long, but it was spectacular. :-)
>
> Jim
Something like ...
http://macenstein.com/default/archives/1405
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Sidekick comes to mind as a particularly troublesome TSR.
But very popular. Indeed, Sidekick was why people invented the SysRq key.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |