 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
John VanSickle escreveu:
> Jeremy "UncleHoot" Praay wrote:
>
>> Bush may have been the worst President in my lifetime. Nixon screwed
>> up,
>> was paranoid, etc. Carter just didn't seem to know what to do. But
>> Bush seemed to do whatever the **** he wanted, and never bothered to
>> explain why to anyone, least of all the American people. World
>> opinion could have been swayed to some extent if he had given it a
>> reasonable attempt, but he never did.
>
> Perhaps he noted that they hated the US before any American presently
> alive was born, and decided that courting their opinion was a waste of
> time. Perhaps he noted that courting world opinion required the chronic
> habit of making unrewarded sacrifices and unreciprocated concessions.
> Perhaps he noted that the press had made a habit of distorting anything
> he said, so he decided that saying nothing was the wisest course of action.
are you from Texas? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
scott wrote:
> It wasn't far off half for Obama either, 53% people voted for him, 46%
> for McCain.
Yes, but your point is...?
I was merely pointing out that the notion that not that many were
supporting Bush because the elections may have been rigged is pretty
weak ground to stand on.
--
I think animal testing is a terrible idea. They get all nervous and give
the wrong answers.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Phil Cook v2 wrote:
> As has been mentioned the simple fact that he's not Bush will endear him
> to the world regardless of what he does next, the bonus that he's young
For a year or so. People here are notoriously amnesiac when it comes to
political issues.
--
I think animal testing is a terrible idea. They get all nervous and give
the wrong answers.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Phil Cook v2 wrote:
> As has been mentioned the simple fact that he's not Bush will endear him
> to the world regardless of what he does next, the bonus that he's young
For a year or so. People here are notoriously amnesiac when it comes to
political issues.
--
I think animal testing is a terrible idea. They get all nervous and give
the wrong answers.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:57:51 -0600, Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> scott wrote:
>> It wasn't far off half for Obama either, 53% people voted for him, 46%
>> for McCain.
>
> Yes, but your point is...?
>
> I was merely pointing out that the notion that not that many were
> supporting Bush because the elections may have been rigged is pretty
> weak ground to stand on.
It's a starting point. Then you have the bad decisions, bad presentation
to the world as a leader, and so on and so forth.
The fact that he had the lowest approval rating of nearly any President
since that's been tracked speaks volumes to his effectiveness as a leader
as well.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> From his speeches that I've heard it seems like he has good intentions,
>> and I like a lot of what he said, but then I guess every politician would
>> sound like that. I'm going to wait to see how he tackles environmental
>> issues, although judging by the size of his car he's not setting a very
>> good example :-) (yes I know it's armour plated etc, but still...)
>>
>>
> armour plating does not make it more fuel efficient.
No, but it provides a reasonable explanation of why it has to be so big and
heavy.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> It wasn't far off half for Obama either, 53% people voted for him, 46%
>> for McCain.
>
> Yes, but your point is...?
It's often quite close to 50/50 (for the raw number of votes) even though
the media make it out to be a massive victory or loss for one side.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
John VanSickle wrote:
> Jeremy "UncleHoot" Praay wrote:
> I think a rude awakening is in store for a lot of his supporters.
I'm some how reminded of this:
http://picturesforsadchildren.com/index.php?comicID=203
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
scott <sco### [at] scott com> wrote:
> From his speeches that I've heard it seems like he has good intentions, and
> I like a lot of what he said, but then I guess every politician would sound
> like that.
"How can you tell when a politician is lying?"
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 22 Jan 2009 05:37:49 -0500, Warp <war### [at] tag povray org> wrote:
>scott <sco### [at] scott com> wrote:
>> From his speeches that I've heard it seems like he has good intentions, and
>> I like a lot of what he said, but then I guess every politician would sound
>> like that.
>
> "How can you tell when a politician is lying?"
His lips move.
Boom, boom!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |