|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
> > Oh, I learned about it in predicate logic, just forgot. :P
>
> Wait... you *learned* predicate logic?
University, Computer Science. Too bad it's not really used in IT jobs. So many
bugs and half-baked business rules would just be a thing of the past, I guess.
If only there were more educated people in IT jobs rather than semi-analphabet
grunts doing drag'n'drop and copy'n'paste...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:58:17 +0100, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>On 22-Dec-08 21:36, Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:03 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, so here's a few short questions...
>>
>> OK then, no, no a thousand times no ;)
Yip!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> 4. Do you know what "existential quantification" means?
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about, so here's a bunny with a
> pancake on its head.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'bunny-pancake.jpg' (19 KB)
Preview of image 'bunny-pancake.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-Dec-08 9:15, Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:58:17 +0100, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
>> On 22-Dec-08 21:36, Stephen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:03 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK, so here's a few short questions...
>>> OK then, no, no a thousand times no ;)
>
> Yip!
Shall I award brownie points to anyone who recognizes this?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:27:16 +0100, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>On 23-Dec-08 9:15, Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:58:17 +0100, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>
>>> On 22-Dec-08 21:36, Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:03 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK, so here's a few short questions...
>>>> OK then, no, no a thousand times no ;)
>>
>> Yip!
>Shall I award brownie points to anyone who recognizes this?
Yes.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> Shall I award brownie points to anyone who recognizes this?
Screw that - I want respect points, such that if I collect enough of
them, I can redeem them to buy actual respect! o_O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-Dec-08 10:44, Invisible wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>
>> Shall I award brownie points to anyone who recognizes this?
>
> Screw that - I want respect points, such that if I collect enough of
> them, I can redeem them to buy actual respect! o_O
In your case I'll convert them to respect points, ok?
Probably not relevant as long as you don't come up with the songtitle
and the performer(s). ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> On 23-Dec-08 10:44, Invisible wrote:
>> andrel wrote:
>>
>>> Shall I award brownie points to anyone who recognizes this?
>>
>> Screw that - I want respect points, such that if I collect enough of
>> them, I can redeem them to buy actual respect! o_O
>
> In your case I'll convert them to respect points, ok?
> Probably not relevant as long as you don't come up with the songtitle
> and the performer(s). ;)
Damn. And I don't have any sound facilities here... So I guess unless
it's the varitable They Might Be Giants, I'm stuffed. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-Dec-08 10:55, Invisible wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>> On 23-Dec-08 10:44, Invisible wrote:
>>> andrel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shall I award brownie points to anyone who recognizes this?
>>>
>>> Screw that - I want respect points, such that if I collect enough of
>>> them, I can redeem them to buy actual respect! o_O
>>
>> In your case I'll convert them to respect points, ok?
>> Probably not relevant as long as you don't come up with the songtitle
>> and the performer(s). ;)
>
> Damn. And I don't have any sound facilities here... So I guess unless
> it's the varitable They Might Be Giants, I'm stuffed. :-P
nope
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Conditionally, no, no, no, yes.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |