POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Religions Server Time
6 Sep 2024 21:23:34 EDT (-0400)
  Religions (Message 22 to 31 of 51)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 12:51:49
Message: <49493c35$1@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:38:44 -0600, Mueen Nawaz wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> I guess agnostic would be Bash scripts or something...?
>> 
>> Bash script programmers are extremely religious about their use of
>> bash.
> 
> 	To be fair, many atheists are quite religious in their devotion 
to it.

True, there is that. :-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 12:52:34
Message: <49493c62$1@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:31:09 +0000, Phil Cook v2 wrote:

> And lo On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:37:14 -0000, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg>
> did spake thusly:
> 
>> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> http://www.aegisub.net/2008/12/if-programming-languages-were-
religions.html
>>
>>   I wonder which programming language would best represent atheism,
>> and which one agnosticism.
> 
> Agnostics tend to lean towards the programming language they were
> brought up with, but will acknowledge any language that's proven to
> work. Atheists of course don't have a programming language and scorn
> those who feel the need to burden themselves with one.

So perhaps Atheists would be represented by a RAD development tool like 
the old AppWare product?

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 12:55:57
Message: <n8fik456uep3uhpmcdlhchp55uf23m3l4q@4ax.com>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:50:41 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> 
>> And mom upside down is wow! :)
>
>Mom upside down sounds more like S/M with dad to me.
>

You need something to do during the long winter nights ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 13:12:29
Message: <4949410d@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> 
> You need something to do during the long winter nights ;)

You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
shop out :p.

-Aero


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 13:38:14
Message: <tnhik458ngmk1ikqbhh7hb1os9lt5vrb8l@4ax.com>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> 
>> You need something to do during the long winter nights ;)
>
>You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>shop out :p.
>

Better ask Andrew ;)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Halbert
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 14:18:38
Message: <4949508e$1@news.povray.org>
>> Somebody on the Haskell list replied with "what do you mean *if*?"
>>
>

Is there no IF THEN ELSE construct in Haskell?

-- 


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 14:25:00
Message: <4949520c$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
> <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> 
>> You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>> shop out :p.
>>
> 
> Better ask Andrew ;)
> 

Somehow I think I'll prefer cute girl over Andrew (no offence, Andy),
especially when she probably lives something like 1500km nearer to me.

-Aero


Post a reply to this message

From: nemesis
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 14:29:13
Message: <49495309$1@news.povray.org>
Halbert escreveu:
>>> Somebody on the Haskell list replied with "what do you mean *if*?"
>>>
> 
> Is there no IF THEN ELSE construct in Haskell?

Sure there is.  That's not what he's referring to by *if*, but to the 
fact that programming languages *are* religions and, thus, should need 
no *if*. ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 14:51:53
Message: <82mik4p99kf3aiph5p06blnvgpe3n0thpe@4ax.com>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:24:20 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
>> <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>>> shop out :p.
>>>
>> 
>> Better ask Andrew ;)
>> 
>
>Somehow I think I'll prefer cute girl over Andrew (no offence, Andy),
>especially when she probably lives something like 1500km nearer to me.
>


Sorry, I was thinking of cute QA girl.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Religions
Date: 17 Dec 2008 15:02:26
Message: <49495ad2@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:24:20 +0200, Eero Ahonen
> <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
>>> <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>>>> shop out :p.
>>>>
>>> Better ask Andrew ;)
>>>
>> Somehow I think I'll prefer cute girl over Andrew (no offence, Andy),
>> especially when she probably lives something like 1500km nearer to me.
>>
> 
> 
> Sorry, I was thinking of cute QA girl.
> 

Well yes, I assume she's still free, but even she lives something like
1500km away from me. Besides, I don't know how cute she is, since I've
never seen her.

;)

-Aero


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.