 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> I got this link today on IRC and thought that I should send it here. Not
> surprisingly, it would've been old.
That's nothing! I got this link from the Haskell mailing list, so I sent
it to... the Haskell mailing list...? o_O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:38:44 -0600, Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> I guess agnostic would be Bash scripts or something...?
>>
>> Bash script programmers are extremely religious about their use of
>> bash.
>
> To be fair, many atheists are quite religious in their devotion
to it.
True, there is that. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:31:09 +0000, Phil Cook v2 wrote:
> And lo On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:37:14 -0000, Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg>
> did spake thusly:
>
>> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> http://www.aegisub.net/2008/12/if-programming-languages-were-
religions.html
>>
>> I wonder which programming language would best represent atheism,
>> and which one agnosticism.
>
> Agnostics tend to lean towards the programming language they were
> brought up with, but will acknowledge any language that's proven to
> work. Atheists of course don't have a programming language and scorn
> those who feel the need to burden themselves with one.
So perhaps Atheists would be represented by a RAD development tool like
the old AppWare product?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:50:41 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>>
>> And mom upside down is wow! :)
>
>Mom upside down sounds more like S/M with dad to me.
>
You need something to do during the long winter nights ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> You need something to do during the long winter nights ;)
You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
shop out :p.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>>
>> You need something to do during the long winter nights ;)
>
>You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>shop out :p.
>
Better ask Andrew ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Somebody on the Haskell list replied with "what do you mean *if*?"
>>
>
Is there no IF THEN ELSE construct in Haskell?
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
> <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>
>> You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>> shop out :p.
>>
>
> Better ask Andrew ;)
>
Somehow I think I'll prefer cute girl over Andrew (no offence, Andy),
especially when she probably lives something like 1500km nearer to me.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Halbert escreveu:
>>> Somebody on the Haskell list replied with "what do you mean *if*?"
>>>
>
> Is there no IF THEN ELSE construct in Haskell?
Sure there is. That's not what he's referring to by *if*, but to the
fact that programming languages *are* religions and, thus, should need
no *if*. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:24:20 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:48 +0200, Eero Ahonen
>> <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>>
>>> You're damn right! Maybe I should ask for the hot girl at almost-near
>>> shop out :p.
>>>
>>
>> Better ask Andrew ;)
>>
>
>Somehow I think I'll prefer cute girl over Andrew (no offence, Andy),
>especially when she probably lives something like 1500km nearer to me.
>
Sorry, I was thinking of cute QA girl.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
