![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7784908.stm
Oh, that's nice. But does anybody have *any clue* specifically which
problem they're on about?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Oh, that's nice. But does anybody have *any clue* specifically which
> problem they're on about?
2 clicks away from that article:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961051.mspx
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"scott" <sco### [at] scott com> wrote in message news:494793e2@news.povray.org...
>> Oh, that's nice. But does anybody have *any clue* specifically which
>> problem they're on about?
>
> 2 clicks away from that article:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961051.mspx
>
In addition, see this link for how it's spreading
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/65235/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
scott wrote:
> 2 clicks away from that article:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961051.mspx
Interesting. I scoured the article from top to bottom looking for links,
but found nothing...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Interesting. I scoured the article from top to bottom looking for links,
> but found nothing...
On the right hand side of almost every BBC news article it has a section
labelled "RELATED INTERNET LINKS" :-) A lot of BBC articles a pretty dumbed
down, so I often visit the related links for more details.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
scott wrote:
>> Interesting. I scoured the article from top to bottom looking for
>> links, but found nothing...
>
> On the right hand side of almost every BBC news article it has a section
> labelled "RELATED INTERNET LINKS" :-) A lot of BBC articles a pretty
> dumbed down, so I often visit the related links for more details.
I see the links, but I don't see anything remotely related to this story.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> On the right hand side of almost every BBC news article it has a section
>> labelled "RELATED INTERNET LINKS" :-) A lot of BBC articles a pretty
>> dumbed down, so I often visit the related links for more details.
>
> I see the links, but I don't see anything remotely related to this story.
Are you looking at the same article that you posted the link to? See
attached images for what I saw and clicked on:
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'image1.png' (99 KB)
Download 'image2.png' (26 KB)
Preview of image 'image1.png'
![image1.png](/povray.off-topic/attachment/%3C4947a55c%40news.povray.org%3E/image1.png?preview=1)
Preview of image 'image2.png'
![image2.png](/povray.off-topic/attachment/%3C4947a55c%40news.povray.org%3E/image2.png?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> I see the links, but I don't see anything remotely related to this story.
>
> Are you looking at the same article that you posted the link to? See
> attached images for what I saw and clicked on:
I just see a long list of links to various homepages. No links to a
specific article.
Is there any way of determining that the article you're looking at is
the particular one they were writing about? Or are we just going on
coincidence?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I just see a long list of links to various homepages. No links to a
> specific article.
But you can reasonably expect an item highlighted in the BBC website to be
on the MS security blog recently...
But yes, the BBC should post the link to the actual article for further
details and not just to a list of security related articles.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7784908.stm
"""
"I cannot recommend people switch due to this one flaw," said John Curran,
head of Microsoft UK's Windows group.
"""
No, of course you can't.
> Oh, that's nice. But does anybody have *any clue* specifically which
> problem they're on about?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/29/AR2005122901456.html
Looks like another image processing buffer overflow.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |