|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> True. Luckily no-one knows that gxblt.zbxt.net is lying on my living
> room at the moment... Oops, well, at least I can also tell that it's
> retired and the machine now seen as zbxt.net/gxblt.zbxt.net is named
> groamba - and the machine that answers to all of your possible network
> calls is actually grunka (which, via SMTP, introduces itself as
> brandher) ;).
I'm really hoping you're not a native speaker of English right now. ;-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
>
> I'm really hoping you're not a native speaker of English right now. ;-)
>
I'm not. Happy now?
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> I'm really hoping you're not a native speaker of English right now. ;-)
> I'm not. Happy now?
Much better, much better. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:06:04 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 12:01:45 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Interesting, I'll have to check those out. But you don't like Atkinson?
>>Why?
>
> You should especially "I, Claudius"
I'll add that to my list. :-) My wife will be happy, I don't doubt.
> I find him more embarrassing than funny and there is another reason that
> I won't go into ^_^
Oh? Now why won't you go into it? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No?
>>>>> No. :-)
>>>> No!
>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>
>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>
> Awwe, thanks!
No! I forbid it! :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>> No!
>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>
>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>
>> Awwe, thanks!
>
> No! I forbid it! :-)
Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too. >:o(
~Steve~ :op
>
> Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>> No!
>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>> Awwe, thanks!
>> No! I forbid it! :-)
>
> Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too. >:o(
>
Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike Raiford" <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49401a44$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
>> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>>> Awwe, thanks!
>>> No! I forbid it! :-)
>>
>> Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too. >:o(
>>
>
> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
>
> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
Lol, you gotta be kiddin' mate... I have the patience of a....
...St. ;)
~Steve~
> --
> ~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Mike Raiford" <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:49401a44$1@news.povray.org...
>> St. wrote:
>>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
>>> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>>>> Awwe, thanks!
>>>> No! I forbid it! :-)
>>> Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too. >:o(
>>>
>> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
>>
>> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
>
> Lol, you gotta be kiddin' mate... I have the patience of a....
>
No, no kidding. See? I did it again!
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-Dec-08 22:04, Mike Raiford wrote:
> St. wrote:
>> "Mike Raiford" <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:49401a44$1@news.povray.org...
>>> St. wrote:
>>>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
>>>> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>>>>> Awwe, thanks!
>>>>> No! I forbid it! :-)
>>>> Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too. >:o(
>>>>
>>> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
>>>
>>> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
>>
>> Lol, you gotta be kiddin' mate... I have the patience of a....
>>
>
> No, no kidding. See? I did it again!
>
Brilliant, congratulations to a job well done.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|