POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Be very very quiet Server Time
7 Sep 2024 09:23:47 EDT (-0400)
  Be very very quiet (Message 71 to 80 of 618)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 12:00:59
Message: <493ea44b$1@news.povray.org>
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:36:29 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:

>> No, I will. ;-)
>> 
>> 
> You sure about that?

Fairly sure. :-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 12:01:45
Message: <493ea479@news.povray.org>
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:28:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 8 Dec 2008 23:46:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> Brian Blessed is so OTT :)
>>
>>Well, *yeah*, one of my favourite reasons for watching the first
>>Blackadder series.  Didn't really care for Edmund in that one, but King
>>Richard was a blast to watch.
> 
> I remember from way back as PC "Fancy" Smith in Z cars. I never watched
> Blackadder partly because I was working offshore and partly because I
> don't like Rowan Atkinson. If you can find a copy of the BBC series "I,
> Claudius" he played Caesar Augustus. Also he played Mr. Western in the
> TV series "The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling" 1997.

Interesting, I'll have to check those out.  But you don't like Atkinson?  
Why?

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 12:06:13
Message: <mb9tj45is9nscvg6j8g8utvp9ej6tjmtru@4ax.com>
On 9 Dec 2008 12:01:45 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Interesting, I'll have to check those out.  But you don't like Atkinson?  
>Why?

You should especially "I, Claudius"
I find him more embarrassing than funny and there is another reason that I won't
go into ^_^
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 12:06:49
Message: <oc9tj4tlf5ubfd94jpo61mmcvn4a7tcejb@4ax.com>
On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> No?
>
>No. :-)

No!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 13:54:49
Message: <493ebef9$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No?
>> No. :-)
> 
> No!

Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Arttu Voutilainen
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 14:23:32
Message: <493ec5b4$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> No?
>>> No. :-)
>>
>> No!
> 
> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
> 
Sure.

-- Arttu Voutilainen


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 14:32:21
Message: <493ec7c5@news.povray.org>
Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> No?
>>>> No. :-)
>>> No!
>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>
> Sure.
> 

Thanks.


-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 14:40:39
Message: <493ec9b7@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No?
>>>>> No. :-)
>>>> No!
>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>
>> Sure.
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 

I can has that as your last word?


Post a reply to this message

From: Arttu Voutilainen
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 15:00:21
Message: <493ece55@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No?
>>>>> No. :-)
>>>> No!
>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>
>> Sure.
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 

You're welcome.

-- Arttu Voutilainen


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Be very very quiet
Date: 9 Dec 2008 15:13:48
Message: <493ed17c@news.povray.org>
Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>> No!
>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> 
> You're welcome.

You do realize that if he understands that in wrong way, you do live
nearer to the airport than I.

> -- Arttu Voutilainen

-Aero


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.