|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>> Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>> MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>> Oh?
>>>> Hmm.
>>> Erm?
>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>
> Achoo!
Snort!
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31 Mar 2009 14:43:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh?
>>>>
>>>> Hmm.
>>>
>>>Erm?
>>
>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>
>Achoo!
Gesundheit.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:42:28 -0500, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Snort!
No worries :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:42:28 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>>> Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>>> MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>>> Oh?
>>>>> Hmm.
>>>> Erm?
>>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>>
>> Achoo!
>
> Snort!
Pffft
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:50:48 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2009 14:43:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm.
>>>>
>>>>Erm?
>>>
>>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>>
>>Achoo!
>
> Gesundheit.
Mumble
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> Mumble
Can I interject something?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:53:41 -0400, Charles C wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Mumble
>
> Can I interject something?
Uh huh. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Austin wrote:
> Tom Austin wrote:
>> I'm hunting wabbits
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5szayh
http://www.ilovewavs.com/comedy/PrankPhone/
check the Arnold Schwarzenegger Impersonator pranks some make me LOL :-D
all except one are peaces of sound tracks of movies of Arnold
Schwarzenegger.
Have a laugh.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This isn't quite at all cartoon physics but I'm sure there's got to be a name
for the forces involved:
http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/12/ski-jump-toilet/
Charles
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:00:36 -0400, Charles C wrote:
> This isn't quite at all cartoon physics but I'm sure there's got to be a
> name for the forces involved:
> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/12/ski-jump-toilet/
>
> Charles
LOL, I'd have to admit, that the first reaction I had was that your
question was "there's gotta be a name for this", to which the answer is
"incredibly silly". "Cold" also comes to mind, as does "potentially very
messy". But then I reread and saw that that wasn't the question you were
suggesting. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |