![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:07:53 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] u washington edu>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] u washington edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
>>> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't even
>>> know that was possible.
>>
>> Is that a hint?
>
>Not at all! I'm quite amused, even if I didn't have the endurance to
>actually keep reading the whole thread :)
I'll let you into a secret but don't tell Jim. Neither have I.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:37:50 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:07:53 -0700, Kevin Wampler
> <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
>
>>Stephen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler
>>> <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
>>>> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't
>>>> even know that was possible.
>>>
>>> Is that a hint?
>>
>>Not at all! I'm quite amused, even if I didn't have the endurance to
>>actually keep reading the whole thread :)
>
> I'll let you into a secret but don't tell Jim. Neither have I.
LOL, that explains a lot. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 26 Mar 2009 13:17:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> I particularly disliked the Yosemite Sam episodes preferring Daffy Duck.
>
>Same here, for the most part. Bugs, Daffy, and Elmer were the best
>combination pretty consistently.
Yip!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:16:08 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] u washington edu>
wrote:
>Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>> Well, they were colour here when I watched them, but it also has been a
>> long time since I've seen any of the "classic" cartoons. "What's Opera,
>> Doc?" being one of my faves.
>
>I love that one too. I'm also a fond of the "Rabbit of Seville" cartoon
>along the same lines:
>
>http://video.yahoo.com/watch/42703/964406
Thanks
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 26 Mar 2009 13:38:24 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:37:50 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:07:53 -0700, Kevin Wampler
>> <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
>>
>>>Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler
>>>> <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
>>>>> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't
>>>>> even know that was possible.
>>>>
>>>> Is that a hint?
>>>
>>>Not at all! I'm quite amused, even if I didn't have the endurance to
>>>actually keep reading the whole thread :)
>>
>> I'll let you into a secret but don't tell Jim. Neither have I.
>
>LOL, that explains a lot. ;-)
>
You were listening?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:48:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2009 13:17:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>> I particularly disliked the Yosemite Sam episodes preferring Daffy
>>> Duck.
>>
>>Same here, for the most part. Bugs, Daffy, and Elmer were the best
>>combination pretty consistently.
>
> Yip!
Though I also was fond of Wile E. Coyote & the roadrunner, too.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:51:07 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2009 13:38:24 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:37:50 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:07:53 -0700, Kevin Wampler
>>> <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler
>>>>> <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
>>>>>> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't
>>>>>> even know that was possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that a hint?
>>>>
>>>>Not at all! I'm quite amused, even if I didn't have the endurance to
>>>>actually keep reading the whole thread :)
>>>
>>> I'll let you into a secret but don't tell Jim. Neither have I.
>>
>>LOL, that explains a lot. ;-)
>>
>>
> You were listening?
Of course. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> Though I also was fond of Wile E. Coyote & the roadrunner, too.
Indeed. It's good to have some highbrow humor about exploding roller-skates.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:34:09 -0700, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Though I also was fond of Wile E. Coyote & the roadrunner, too.
>
> Indeed. It's good to have some highbrow humor about exploding
> roller-skates.
You betcha! ;-)
And my favourite, of course - which I can't remember what it was called
now - is when the character runs out of ground and keeps running until
such time as they realise that there's nothing under them.
It's going to bother me that I can't remember the term now.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> And my favourite, of course - which I can't remember what it was called
> now - is when the character runs out of ground and keeps running until
> such time as they realise that there's nothing under them.
>
> It's going to bother me that I can't remember the term now.
I'm pretty sure I never knew the term, but now it's going to bug me too.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |