On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:48:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 21 Mar 2009 18:25:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:16:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> A red double decker.
>>>>
>>>>So rather than fall for the Johnson Trap, you instead fell for the
>>>>Boris Trap. ;-)
>>>>
>>> Duh! That sounds like winkles at dawn!
>>
>>Perhaps, but that means you forfeit your turn again. ;-)
>>
>>So I'm going to continue to stay on the train I'm on and go to Notting
>>Hill Gate.
>>
>>Jim
> 
> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.

This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Mar 2009 14:29:42 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:48:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 21 Mar 2009 18:25:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:16:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> A red double decker.
>>>>>
>>>>>So rather than fall for the Johnson Trap, you instead fell for the
>>>>>Boris Trap. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> Duh! That sounds like winkles at dawn!
>>>
>>>Perhaps, but that means you forfeit your turn again. ;-)
>>>
>>>So I'm going to continue to stay on the train I'm on and go to Notting
>>>Hill Gate.
>>>
>>>Jim
>> 
>> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.
>
>This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)
>
>

It is not, I won.

Fineto.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:15:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.
>>
>>This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
> It is not, I won.

Well, no, the Boris trap you fell into invalidated your last move. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Mar 2009 20:27:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:15:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.
>>>
>>>This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It is not, I won.
>
>Well, no, the Boris trap you fell into invalidated your last move. ;-)
>
>

No it  didn't. Ken still lives.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:05:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Mar 2009 20:27:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:15:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.
>>>>
>>>>This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It is not, I won.
>>
>>Well, no, the Boris trap you fell into invalidated your last move. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
> No it  didn't. Ken still lives.

Ah, now I missed that part of the rule.  Fair enough.

Given that your adjudicator said it was a mug's game, I guess that means 
I get the first go this time around. :-)

Notting Hill Gate.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 23 Mar 2009 12:16:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:05:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 22 Mar 2009 20:27:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:15:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.
>>>>>
>>>>>This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It is not, I won.
>>>
>>>Well, no, the Boris trap you fell into invalidated your last move. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> No it  didn't. Ken still lives.
>
>Ah, now I missed that part of the rule.  Fair enough.
>
>Given that your adjudicator said it was a mug's game, I guess that means 
>I get the first go this time around. :-)
>
>Notting Hill Gate.
>
Mug's away, mug's game is something different.

Anyway I thought that the game had reached its natural conclusion and would
return later for a new series.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:54:24 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 23 Mar 2009 12:16:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:05:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 Mar 2009 20:27:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:15:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> You can spend all day on the circle line for very little cost.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This is true, but it's your turn. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> It is not, I won.
>>>>
>>>>Well, no, the Boris trap you fell into invalidated your last move. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No it  didn't. Ken still lives.
>>
>>Ah, now I missed that part of the rule.  Fair enough.
>>
>>Given that your adjudicator said it was a mug's game, I guess that means
>>I get the first go this time around. :-)
>>
>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>
> Mug's away, mug's game is something different.

Ah, right - right thought, wrong terminology. :-)

> Anyway I thought that the game had reached its natural conclusion and
> would return later for a new series.

Fair enough, I can save it for later. :-)

Duck season! ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 24 Mar 2009 12:05:36 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> Mug's away, mug's game is something different.
>
>Ah, right - right thought, wrong terminology. :-)
>

I thought so :)

>> Anyway I thought that the game had reached its natural conclusion and
>> would return later for a new series.
>
>Fair enough, I can save it for later. :-)
>
>Duck season! ;-)

Only if it is crispy aromatic duck <Yum yum>
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:15:25 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 24 Mar 2009 12:05:36 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> Mug's away, mug's game is something different.
>>
>>Ah, right - right thought, wrong terminology. :-)
>>
>>
> I thought so :)

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. ;-)

>>> Anyway I thought that the game had reached its natural conclusion and
>>> would return later for a new series.
>>
>>Fair enough, I can save it for later. :-)
>>
>>Duck season! ;-)
> 
> Only if it is crispy aromatic duck <Yum yum>

Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 24 Mar 2009 13:03:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)

That's a Woosh!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message