|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:21:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>>
>>I don't think I need to. ;-)
>
> It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
Apparently. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5 Dec 2008 15:18:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:21:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>>>
>>>I don't think I need to. ;-)
>>
>> It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
>
>Apparently. ;-)
>
Who's going to have the last word?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:17:55 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2008 15:18:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:21:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>>>>
>>>>I don't think I need to. ;-)
>>>
>>> It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
>>
>>Apparently. ;-)
>>
>>
> Who's going to have the last word?
Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Who's going to have the last word?
>
>Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>
It does at the moment :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>
>
> It does at the moment :)
No it doesn't ;P
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>
>>
>> It does at the moment :)
>
>No it doesn't ;P
Yes, it does :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>
>>> It does at the moment :)
>> No it doesn't ;P
>
> Yes, it does :)
Nuh uh ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:48 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>
>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>> No it doesn't ;P
>>
>> Yes, it does :)
>
>Nuh uh ...
Oh! Yes it does!
(The Panto season is upon us :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:48 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>>
>>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>>> No it doesn't ;P
>>> Yes, it does :)
>> Nuh uh ...
>
> Oh! Yes it does!
>
Does not!
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>
>>Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>
>>
> It does at the moment :)
But which moment? You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |