|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>
>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>
>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>
>>Probably a wise decision.
>
> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2 Dec 2008 15:01:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>>
>>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>>
>>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>>
>>>Probably a wise decision.
>>
>> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
>
>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>
I have a cold!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:08:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2008 15:01:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>>>
>>>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>>>
>>>>Probably a wise decision.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
>>
>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>
> I have a cold!
But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2 Dec 2008 18:17:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:08:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 2 Dec 2008 15:01:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>>>>
>>>>>Probably a wise decision.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
>>>
>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>
>> I have a cold!
>
>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>
OK then, I miss you ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>>
>>> I have a cold!
>>
>>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>>
> OK then, I miss you ;)
Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
(Now tell me, honestly, how could I *not* reply in that manner?)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3 Dec 2008 12:23:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> I have a cold!
>>>
>>>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>>>
>> OK then, I miss you ;)
>
>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>
What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>(Now tell me, honestly, how could I *not* reply in that manner?)
>
No need to be shy, just unburden yourself, in all confidence.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:02:08 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 3 Dec 2008 12:23:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I have a cold!
>>>>
>>>>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>>>>
>>> OK then, I miss you ;)
>>
>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>
> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted the
scope is on that rifle.... ;-)
>>(Now tell me, honestly, how could I *not* reply in that manner?)
>>
> No need to be shy, just unburden yourself, in all confidence.
LOL
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3 Dec 2008 19:48:32 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>>
>> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>
>Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted the
>scope is on that rifle.... ;-)
Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:53:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 3 Dec 2008 19:48:32 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>>>
>>> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>>
>>Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted
>>the scope is on that rifle.... ;-)
>
> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
I don't think I need to. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5 Dec 2008 12:04:55 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:53:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 3 Dec 2008 19:48:32 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>>>
>>>Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted
>>>the scope is on that rifle.... ;-)
>>
>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>
>I don't think I need to. ;-)
It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|