On 24 Dec 2008 14:48:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:56:09 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 23 Dec 2008 16:43:20 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Well, it'll be here at home, tonight, while watching a movie, but will
>>>do.
>>>
>>>

>
>Cheers!
>
>>>We got more snow today. :-(
>> 

>
>28F here in Utah right now.  :-)
>
>Time for movies to start! :-)
>
>Jim

Happy Christmas.

To one and all.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:51:44 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> Happy Christmas.
> 
> To one and all.

And to you and yours - hope they were good!

(And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 5 Jan 2009 17:50:36 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:51:44 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Happy Christmas.
>> 
>> To one and all.
>
>And to you and yours - hope they were good!
>

They were, quiet but good.

>(And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>

I was just thinking that :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:

>> (And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>
> 
> I was just thinking that :)

Not dead. Just sleeping.

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:25:24 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
>>> (And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>>
>> 
>> I was just thinking that :)
>
>Not dead. Just sleeping.

Too much Christmas fare?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:

>>>> (And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>>>
>>> I was just thinking that :)
>> Not dead. Just sleeping.
> 
> Too much Christmas fare?

Funny thing ... I can't stand candy canes.

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:44:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 5 Jan 2009 17:50:36 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:51:44 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> Happy Christmas.
>>> 
>>> To one and all.
>>
>>And to you and yours - hope they were good!
>>
>>
> They were, quiet but good.

Quiet is good.  Unfortunately, on New Year's Eve, we ended up going to 
the ER.  My wife has had some mysterious medical issue that causes her to 
have severe problems with her digestive tract.  The doctors have no idea 
what it is, but we hadn't seen it in about a year.  Until about 10 
minutes after midnight, that is.

This time they're saying "bacterial infection", but we've heard that 
before.

So NYE wasn't quiet for us, and I had a cold before that, but otherwise 
it was pretty quiet.

>>(And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>
>>
> I was just thinking that :)

I know, that's why I said what I said.  Freaky, isn't it? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:28:25 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>> (And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>>>>
>>>> I was just thinking that :)
>>> Not dead. Just sleeping.
>> 
>> Too much Christmas fare?
>
>Funny thing ... I can't stand candy canes.

I've seen those in comics etc but not in RL. What sort of candy are they?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 6 Jan 2009 11:32:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Quiet is good.  Unfortunately, on New Year's Eve, we ended up going to 
>the ER.  My wife has had some mysterious medical issue that causes her to 
>have severe problems with her digestive tract.  The doctors have no idea 
>what it is, but we hadn't seen it in about a year.  Until about 10 
>minutes after midnight, that is.
>
>This time they're saying "bacterial infection", but we've heard that 
>before.
>

Bummer! Seeing the New Year in, in A&E (as we call it here). I hope that she
gets better soon.

>So NYE wasn't quiet for us, and I had a cold before that, but otherwise 
>it was pretty quiet.
>

I picked up a chest infection that was very bad for about three weeks but it is
almost gone now.

>>>(And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>>
>>>
>> I was just thinking that :)
>
>I know, that's why I said what I said.  Freaky, isn't it? ;-)

... And fools seldom differ ;-)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:28:25 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>>> (And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )
>>>>>>
>>>>> I was just thinking that :)
>>>> Not dead. Just sleeping.
>>> Too much Christmas fare?
>> Funny thing ... I can't stand candy canes.
> 
> I've seen those in comics etc but not in RL. What sort of candy are they?

peppermint

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message