On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:49:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:23:48 +0000, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Thanks again, that was worth watching.
>>
>>I think it should be hosted on the PovRay site (again)
> 
> Another link
> 
> http://www.josleys.com/

Oooh, I'll have to check that one out, too. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:14:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:58:52 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I
>>could learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a B
>>on the labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an A
>>on the labwork adn a D on the classroom work.
> 
> I was just duff :)

I always learn better with hands-on classroom elements.  Straight 
memorisation is not my forte.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:35:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:59:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:30:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>And your conclusion?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'll go for it ;)
>>
>>We have to be getting close. :-)
>>
>>
> A bit to go yet.

A bit, or a byte? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:14:15 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 18:01:07 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2008 17:02:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> I meant as an actor not a stand up.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, yeah, there is that.  Though the way he went and went and went in
>>>>Aladdin was apparently very entertaining.
>>> 
>>> Not seen it
>>
>>In the interview I referred to before, he talks about it - I have only
>>seen pieces of the final film myself.  What he said, though, was they
>>had about 16 hours of material to choose from - he just started and kept
>>on going.  The animators were there watching and getting ideas so they
>>could animate the genie after the final lines were chosen.
>>
>>A very nontraditional way for doing animation, at least for Disney. :-)
>>
>>
> He said something similar in the interview I saw.

Where was that one? :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>>>
>> He said something similar in the interview I saw.
>
>Where was that one? :-)

He was over here recently, either that or it was an old programme. I can't
remember who the chat show host was. I don't think it was Jonathan Woss (may he
receive his P45) or I would not have watched it.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:29 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> A bit to go yet.
>
>A bit, or a byte? ;-)

Ah! Reminds me of a patch (remember them) I once had.
Love at first byte :)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:12 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

 
>>>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I
>>>could learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a B
>>>on the labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an A
>>>on the labwork adn a D on the classroom work.
>> 
>> I was just duff :)
>
>I always learn better with hands-on classroom elements.  Straight 
>memorisation is not my forte.
>

I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was good at it
until I went to university. It could have been zoology for all I knew. Or it
could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I consumed.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:38:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> He said something similar in the interview I saw.
>>
>>Where was that one? :-)
> 
> He was over here recently, either that or it was an old programme. I
> can't remember who the chat show host was. I don't think it was Jonathan
> Woss (may he receive his P45) or I would not have watched it.

Guess I'll ahve to have a look at IMDB and see if I can determine what it 
was. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:43:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:12 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I
>>>>could learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a
>>>>B on the labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an
>>>>A on the labwork adn a D on the classroom work.
>>> 
>>> I was just duff :)
>>
>>I always learn better with hands-on classroom elements.  Straight
>>memorisation is not my forte.
>>
>>
> I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was
> good at it until I went to university. It could have been zoology for
> all I knew. Or it could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I
> consumed.

LOL, that might just have had something to do with it.  :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:39:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:29 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> A bit to go yet.
>>
>>A bit, or a byte? ;-)
> 
> Ah! Reminds me of a patch (remember them) I once had. Love at first byte
> :)

:-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message