 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://tinyurl.com/67foxn
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/67foxn
I believe Warp collects these...
Personally, I have to wonder whether manually typing something 25 times
can count as "programming". I mean, how hard would it be to just type
out the Mandelbrot set and have the program print that? Wouldn't prove
much though, would it?? :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think all that was for the ascii halftoning. The code is indeed actually
calculating the M set. I wonder what kind of performance impact it would
have if I ran this on our SQL server.... I guess it would be best to run it
on development :-P
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Halbert" <hal### [at] gmail com> wrote in message
news:492443a1$1@news.povray.org...
>I think all that was for the ascii halftoning. The code is indeed actually
>calculating the M set. I wonder what kind of performance impact it would
>have if I ran this on our SQL server.... I guess it would be best to run it
>on development :-P
>
I just ran it on my local SQL Express. It took a few seconds.
But looking at the source, it's amazing how little I really know about TSQL.
:-/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have a one I wrote for MS Excel. Running it reminds me of the days when we
would try to do it in QBasic or GW Basic. Its like trying to observe a tree
growing.
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Personally, I have to wonder whether manually typing something 25 times
> can count as "programming". I mean, how hard would it be to just type
> out the Mandelbrot set and have the program print that? Wouldn't prove
> much though, would it?? :-P
Pretty damn hard, given you have infinite detail...
--
Psychoceramics: The study of crackpots.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Halbert wrote:
> I have a one I wrote for MS Excel. Running it reminds me of the days when we
> would try to do it in QBasic or GW Basic. Its like trying to observe a tree
> growing.
I did it with MS Excel. IIRC, I used a seperate worksheet for each
iteration (since I don't know how to use VB). But when I tried to print
the resulting hieghtfield... the printer queue jammed! o_O
This was back in 1997, so I guess computer technology wasn't ready to
handle it yet or something.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Personally, I have to wonder whether manually typing something 25 times
>> can count as "programming". I mean, how hard would it be to just type
>> out the Mandelbrot set and have the program print that? Wouldn't prove
>> much though, would it?? :-P
>
> Pretty damn hard, given you have infinite detail...
Not in any specific finite plot you dont. :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/67foxn
But can he do it in COBOL?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
