|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>>
>> ...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
>>
>
> Heh. I remember in just about every commissary and exchange there being
> certain "top shelf" magazines available for purchase. Wouldn't change my
> perception a bit ...
So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
>>>
>>
>> Heh. I remember in just about every commissary and exchange there
>> being certain "top shelf" magazines available for purchase. Wouldn't
>> change my perception a bit ...
>
> So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
>
? err What do you mean? (I've never played FarCry before) Now I'm afraid.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
>
> ? err What do you mean? (I've never played FarCry before) Now I'm afraid.
Lots of the mercenary camps have magazines scattered around with
scantily-clad ladies in them. At least, I *think* that's what those 12
pixels are supposed to represent... kinda hard to tell.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
>>
>> ? err What do you mean? (I've never played FarCry before) Now I'm afraid.
>
> Lots of the mercenary camps have magazines scattered around with
> scantily-clad ladies in them. At least, I *think* that's what those 12
> pixels are supposed to represent... kinda hard to tell.
>
Oh.. yep. thats why :) Those mags were very available on the base, but
you couldn't find them off base in the city I lived in, where I lived
was known as part of the "bible belt". But the base had all of the
hustler and playboy you could ever want.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> > Not in the US. If your protests indeed disrupt the government, or
> > traffic, or so many other things, you get in trouble.
> The protests are supposed to disrupt the government. It's *supposed* to
> be OK, as long as it's peaceful.
And as long as you don't leave the "free speech zone"? ;)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Mueen Nawaz wrote:
>>> Not in the US. If your protests indeed disrupt the government, or
>>> traffic, or so many other things, you get in trouble.
>
>> The protests are supposed to disrupt the government. It's *supposed* to
>> be OK, as long as it's peaceful.
>
> And as long as you don't leave the "free speech zone"? ;)
As I said, "supposed to". Yeah, it's pretty f'ing shameful around here
lately.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> And as long as you don't leave the "free speech zone"? ;)
Someone told me that the reason people used soapboxes to make speeches was
that there was a law that you couldn't speak against the government if you
were standing on the country's territory, or some similar wording. So they
stood on soapboxes to avoid touching the country's soil with their feet :)
I should probably check snopes.com about it right now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
> porn dissemination! o_O
>
Excuse me?
"The Internet is for Porn" remember?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Or being a soldier.
"Legal" doesn't mean "good", but ok...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Now, see, if I paid money to access the Internet, and then my ISP tried
> to prevent me accessing the Internet, I'd be... quite upset.
But you signed a contract saying they're allowed to do such throttling ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |