 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> So you're seriously suggesting that somebody did all that R&D just to
>> illegally copy stuff?
>
> Sure, if it means they can get loads of free music and movies. Human
> nature 101.
That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
porn dissemination! o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> So you're seriously suggesting that somebody did all that R&D just to
>>> illegally copy stuff?
>>
>> Sure, if it means they can get loads of free music and movies. Human
>> nature 101.
>
> That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
> porn dissemination! o_O
>
You mean it wasn't? XD
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
>> That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
>> porn dissemination! o_O
>>
>
> You mean it wasn't? XD
...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> ...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
>
Heh. I remember in just about every commissary and exchange there being
certain "top shelf" magazines available for purchase. Wouldn't change my
perception a bit ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>>
>> ...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
>>
>
> Heh. I remember in just about every commissary and exchange there being
> certain "top shelf" magazines available for purchase. Wouldn't change my
> perception a bit ...
So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
>>>
>>
>> Heh. I remember in just about every commissary and exchange there
>> being certain "top shelf" magazines available for purchase. Wouldn't
>> change my perception a bit ...
>
> So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
>
? err What do you mean? (I've never played FarCry before) Now I'm afraid.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
>
> ? err What do you mean? (I've never played FarCry before) Now I'm afraid.
Lots of the mercenary camps have magazines scattered around with
scantily-clad ladies in them. At least, I *think* that's what those 12
pixels are supposed to represent... kinda hard to tell.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> So that's why there were so many weird pictures in FarCry then...?
>>
>> ? err What do you mean? (I've never played FarCry before) Now I'm afraid.
>
> Lots of the mercenary camps have magazines scattered around with
> scantily-clad ladies in them. At least, I *think* that's what those 12
> pixels are supposed to represent... kinda hard to tell.
>
Oh.. yep. thats why :) Those mags were very available on the base, but
you couldn't find them off base in the city I lived in, where I lived
was known as part of the "bible belt". But the base had all of the
hustler and playboy you could ever want.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
> Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> > Not in the US. If your protests indeed disrupt the government, or
> > traffic, or so many other things, you get in trouble.
> The protests are supposed to disrupt the government. It's *supposed* to
> be OK, as long as it's peaceful.
And as long as you don't leave the "free speech zone"? ;)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Mueen Nawaz wrote:
>>> Not in the US. If your protests indeed disrupt the government, or
>>> traffic, or so many other things, you get in trouble.
>
>> The protests are supposed to disrupt the government. It's *supposed* to
>> be OK, as long as it's peaceful.
>
> And as long as you don't leave the "free speech zone"? ;)
As I said, "supposed to". Yeah, it's pretty f'ing shameful around here
lately.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
