 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote in message
news:490c23e3@news.povray.org...
> Seems to be lacking the caudal fin. Making a google image search of
> "fish skeleton" I can't find even one example where there's no caudal fin.
Try "dolphin skeleton". Dorsal & caudal fin are cartilagenous.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
> news:490c23e3@news.povray.org...
> > Seems to be lacking the caudal fin. Making a google image search of
> > "fish skeleton" I can't find even one example where there's no caudal fin.
> Try "dolphin skeleton". Dorsal & caudal fin are cartilagenous.
I suppose it all comes down to the finer details of the mythology, but
all classical depictions I remember always have had a fish lower body
(with scales).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> I suppose it all comes down to the finer details of the mythology, but
> all classical depictions I remember always have had a fish lower body
> (with scales).
Yah, but a dolphin-like lower body makes more physiological sense, what with
both being mammal.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Yah, but a dolphin-like lower body makes more physiological sense, what with
> both being mammal.
Mermaids overall don't make too much physiological sense. For instance,
I don't think human skin would withstand constant contact with sea water
for extended periods of time (years)... :)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Cook" <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> http://cgi.4chan.org/ic/res/286726.html
>
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
I see a guy there still annoyed at your "dolphin mermaid fucking" drawing. I
webforum. They simply don't get the difference between hentai and
finely-crafted art with erotic elements.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> They simply don't get the difference between hentai and
> finely-crafted art with erotic elements.
Maybe it's rule 34 taken one step forward: Not only there is porn of
everything, but everything must be porn (or it sucks).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Maybe it's rule 34 taken one step forward: Not only there is porn of
> everything, but everything must be porn (or it sucks).
The Internet is for porn.
The Internet is for porn.
Why you think the net was born?
Porn! Porn! Porn!
Gaaaaah!! Now I have that song in my head... >_<
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.490c4464fa6ca371fd1f51740@news.povray.org...
> I see a guy there still annoyed at your "dolphin mermaid fucking" drawing.
> I
> teen-infested
> webforum. They simply don't get the difference between hentai and
> finely-crafted art with erotic elements.
(despite/because of being in a webforum whose primary focus is such).
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Gaaaaah!! Now I have that song in my head... >_<
>
It's a great song. So full of truth.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> Yah, but a dolphin-like lower body makes more physiological sense, what
> with both being mammal.
I also don't think the point is to have a mammal lower half. The point
was they're all enticing on top and all scaley and cold on the bottom.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
