 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> (And just what did you think I was gonna do if you said don't google for
> [X] ... Google it, of course ;) )
Don't google "bukkake". Especially not at work.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Don't google "bukkake". Especially not at work.
>
Errrrr ....
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Don't google "bukkake". Especially not at work.
>
> Errrrr ....
WIN!!!!!eleven! :-D
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-Oct-08 22:26, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>
>>
>> [1] I don't know the exact brand offhand, no. :-) Don't google "madrong".
>>
>
> Oh, good. it doesn't come up with anything nasty, thankfully.
>
> (And just what did you think I was gonna do if you said don't google for
> [X] ... Google it, of course ;) )
I think it was just a way to bring the power of google again to the
attention of our mascot. Most of the more obvious ways seem to have
failed too often. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> http://download.orphi.me.uk/Music/G3/Silhouettes.ogg
>
I've heard this tune before. I think you might have posted it a while
back, but yes... neat. All waveguide? one patch sounded kind of
electronic, too.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> http://download.orphi.me.uk/Music/G3/Silhouettes.ogg
>>
>
> I've heard this tune before. I think you might have posted it a while
> back
Indeed yes.
> but yes... neat. All waveguide? one patch sounded kind of
> electronic, too.
All waveguides. Just different settings of the sliders. ;-)
There's a sound in there which actually runs two notes very slightly out
of tune for a phasing effect; it sounds moderately electronic.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:32:32 -0500, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>I've heard this tune before.
It was used as a pop tune decades ago. I can't remember the name.
Andrew, your touch is getting better. :D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I've heard this tune before.
>
> It was used as a pop tune decades ago. I can't remember the name.
It was called - wait for it - Silhouettes.
http://artists.letssingit.com/hermans-hermits-lyrics-silhouettes-xbj5f89
(A favourite tune of mine, BTW.)
> Andrew, your touch is getting better. :D
Heh, sadly not. This is purely sequenced. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:25:37 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>>> I've heard this tune before.
>>
>> It was used as a pop tune decades ago. I can't remember the name.
>
>It was called - wait for it - Silhouettes.
>
>http://artists.letssingit.com/hermans-hermits-lyrics-silhouettes-xbj5f89
>
>(A favourite tune of mine, BTW.)
>
I played it to my wife (Delphi the oracle) and she not only told me it was
Silhouettes on the shade by Herman's Hermits (January 1965), she sang all the
verses
Then I saw your link when I was replying.
I was 14 when it reached #3.
>> Andrew, your touch is getting better. :D
>
>Heh, sadly not. This is purely sequenced. ;-)
Opps! One more time, with feeling :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> It was called - wait for it - Silhouettes.
>>
>> http://artists.letssingit.com/hermans-hermits-lyrics-silhouettes-xbj5f89
>>
>> (A favourite tune of mine, BTW.)
>
> I played it to my wife (Delphi the oracle) and she not only told me it was
> Silhouettes on the shade by Herman's Hermits (January 1965), she sang all the
> verses
> Then I saw your link when I was replying.
> I was 14 when it reached #3.
Heh. I hadn't even been born yet. (But I can still sing all the lyrics...)
>>> Andrew, your touch is getting better. :D
>> Heh, sadly not. This is purely sequenced. ;-)
>
> Opps! One more time, with feeling :)
;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
