 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> OTOH, I'm pretty sure that 98% of everything on YouTube is illegal,
>> and I have watched some of it, so...... ;-)
>
> Closer to 30%, I heard from a recent lawsuit about it. On the other
> hand, if 75% of everything on youtube is crap, guess which part the
> home-built videos probably fall in to.
Heh. Look up "why is the rum gone?" There seems to be a huge profusion
of videos like this - except that some of them are actually quite good,
but most of them are totally lame.
Neat: Why is the rum gone?
Kinda funny: They're taking the Hobbits to Isengard.
Kinda lame: This is SPARTAAAAAAAA!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Also, certainly on the DVDs I've looked at, the video data is split into
> several VOB files, seemingly at random. How do I join them back together?
If you have one or more VOB files whose size is exactly 2GB, and then
another (following the number sequence)... just concatenate them. I think
that's a workaround for a file size limitation on DVDs.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Other than that, everything I own is ilegal.
Interesting typo there.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>> But it also explains why you haven't seen divx/xvid videos with good
>> quality/size ratios. (That is, because I would estimate at least 99% of
>> divx/xvid/h264 videos out there are illegal.)
>
> 99% of DivX/Xvid/H264? Surely it would be accurate to say "99% of ALL
> VIDEO on the Internet"? ;-)
Nope, that's exaggerating. Quite a large percentage of the video on the
Internet would be legal porn. That's what the Internet is for, after all.
(argh, now I won't get that song off my head. "The Internet is for porn...")
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> (argh, now I won't get that song off my head. "The Internet is for porn...")
HAHAHAHAHA! >:-D
But which version? The WoW version? The StarCraft version? THE LEGO
VERSION??
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
>> (argh, now I won't get that song off my head. "The Internet is for
>> porn...")
>
> HAHAHAHAHA! >:-D
>
> But which version? The WoW version? The StarCraft version? THE LEGO
> VERSION??
>
The *original* version. (which isn't available on YouTube anymore)
Wait.
There is a LEGO VERSION?!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Wait.
>
> There is a LEGO VERSION?!
THERE IS A LEGO VERSION OF EVERYTHING!!!eleven!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> THERE IS A LEGO VERSION OF EVERYTHING!!!eleven!
I wonder how that assertion interacts with rule 34.
Actually, I'm not sure if I want to know.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> THERE IS A LEGO VERSION OF EVERYTHING!!!eleven!
>
> I wonder how that assertion interacts with rule 34.
>
> Actually, I'm not sure if I want to know.
Have you seen the LEGO Star Wars IV porn video?
(No, I'm not making that up...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20-Oct-08 10:04, Invisible wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> THERE IS A LEGO VERSION OF EVERYTHING!!!eleven!
>>
>> I wonder how that assertion interacts with rule 34.
>>
>> Actually, I'm not sure if I want to know.
>
> Have you seen the LEGO Star Wars IV porn video?
No, do I want to?
> (No, I'm not making that up...)
Eek!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
