 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
* Your score: 4
* Gender: Male
* Age range: 20-29
* Best score for your gender and age range: 0
* Highest score for your gender and age range: 1520
Did better than I expected.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
>
> * Your score: 4
> * Gender: Male
> * Age range: 20-29
> * Best score for your gender and age range: 0
> * Highest score for your gender and age range: 1520
>
> Did better than I expected.
It's 2:15 am. Right now my eyes feel like they're gonna blow up. Should I
even try?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Did better than I expected.
Cool, I got 15 and I was sure everything looked ok! Will have to try again
later in the dark...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Or rather, "test your monitor", presumably? :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Or rather, "test your monitor", presumably? :-P
Reminds me when my science teacher at school used some crappy small speaker
to demonstrate to us the human hearing frequency range. It wasn't
surprising that none of us could hear below 40 Hz!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> Reminds me when my science teacher at school used some crappy small
> speaker to demonstrate to us the human hearing frequency range. It
> wasn't surprising that none of us could hear below 40 Hz!
I saw a similar thing, but with a British Telecom osciliscope for
testing underground cable. It was a big black metal box roughly the size
of a typical HiFi component, with a big blurry blue/purple LCD. I have
no idea if this means it had a less crappy speaker in it though...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:48f30b70$1@news.povray.org...
> Or rather, "test your monitor", presumably? :-P
I dunno. Are monitors really *that* different? The task here is to
visually distinguish between unique hues, without specifying exactly what
they look like other than being all different.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Or rather, "test your monitor", presumably? :-P
>
> I dunno. Are monitors really *that* different? The task here is to
> visually distinguish between unique hues, without specifying exactly
> what they look like other than being all different.
Well, if one of the guys in our lab tried this, they'd have a problem.
The red gun on one of the CRT monitors only fires at about 20%
brightness, so everything comes out looking a weird bluish colour.
(Also, the "black" actually comes out dark grey instead of black. And
there's pale white zigzag lines across the screen that won't go away...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
>
> * Your score: 4
> * Gender: Male
> * Age range: 20-29
Well, I got 60.
I could say something about this LCD being half-broken, but basically I
suspect I just suck.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
# our score: 3
# Gender: Male
# Age range: 30-39
# Best score for your gender and age range: 0
# Highest score for your gender and age range: 1468
Someone scored 0... The test itself is rather diabolical, shifts in
subtle pastel hues are difficult to distinguish even in the best of
conditions.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
