Invisible wrote:
> Strictly, shouldn't it be ++C? I mean, "C++" would have the same value> as "C" (yet incrimenting C afterwards).
You're not the first pedant to mention that.
>> Strictly, shouldn't it be ++C? I mean, "C++" would have the same value>> as "C" (yet incrimenting C afterwards).> > You're not the first pedant to mention that.
Yay, me!