 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
48d48f0b$1@news.povray.org...
>
> I don't really follow off topic too much so don't know if htis had been
> posted, but I found it amusing. Scored 8.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5tkxcc
I scored 4.
I agree one can't really see if his performance is good.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
48d57a96$1@news.povray.org...
> I scored 4.
At 2nd try with a little more attention I score 0
That means as other senses, color vision is improved by training :-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
m_a_r_c nous illumina en ce 2008-09-20 18:35 -->
> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msn com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 48d48f0b$1@news.povray.org...
>> I don't really follow off topic too much so don't know if htis had been
>> posted, but I found it amusing. Scored 8.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/5tkxcc
>
> I scored 4.
> I agree one can't really see if his performance is good.
>
> Marc
>
>
4 is prety good. The lower your score, the better.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Grabel's Law: 2 is not equal to 3 -- not even for large values of 2.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
48d57f54$1@news.povray.org...
>>
> 4 is prety good. The lower your score, the better.
I understood that, thank you :)
But that does not say where I am on the scores distribution for my age
range.
BTW the last try gave a score of 11 while I was certain to be fairly good
:-/
Certainly time to go to bed ^^
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
>
> Evolutionary the retina was brain tissue, somehow I don't think this is
> what you meant.
>
You are right, I meant that I could mentally influence my perception.
To a limited extent, if I expected a certain tile would fall in a
certain place my eye would confirm my expectation.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
>
> I don't really follow off topic too much so don't know if htis had been
> posted, but I found it amusing. Scored 8.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5tkxcc
That's what I got.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Attwood wrote:
> I scored 20.
Well I scored 27.
But we all know I suck...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
48d5fcc1$1@news.povray.org...
> Tim Attwood wrote:
>
>> I scored 20.
>
> Well I scored 27.
>
> But we all know I suck...
>
This morning after a good night, I scored 21, much worse than yesterday
night.
But now sun is shining (though not directly on my CRT) and I suspect this
makes hues less easy to discriminate.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20-Sep-08 7:49, Jim Charter wrote:
>
> I don't really follow off topic too much so don't know if htis had been
> posted, but I found it amusing. Scored 8.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5tkxcc
Do I spot a trend that the younger people score higher? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel nous illumina en ce 2008-09-21 06:56 -->
> On 20-Sep-08 7:49, Jim Charter wrote:
>>
>> I don't really follow off topic too much so don't know if htis had
>> been posted, but I found it amusing. Scored 8.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/5tkxcc
>
> Do I spot a trend that the younger people score higher? ;)
Maybe the youngers are not as patient as ther elders. Or just say, now, it's
good enough. Or don't bother to make the effort needed.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
I've always wanted to be somebody but don't remember who.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
