POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager Server Time
7 Sep 2024 07:25:20 EDT (-0400)
  This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager (Message 42 to 51 of 51)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 19 Aug 2008 15:44:56
Message: <48ab22b8$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Henderson wrote:
> Yeah, but saying "Linux doesn't" says that no distribution does,

"Linux isn't a distribution, it's a kernel!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beating_a_dead_horse

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 19 Aug 2008 16:01:57
Message: <48ab26b5$1@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Yeah, but saying "Linux doesn't" says that no distribution does,
> 
> "Linux isn't a distribution, it's a kernel!"
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beating_a_dead_horse
> 

Flamewar! Flamewar!

*grabs some snacks and leans back*

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid










:-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 19 Aug 2008 17:44:25
Message: <48ab3eb9$1@news.povray.org>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:44:56 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Yeah, but saying "Linux doesn't" says that no distribution does,
> 
> "Linux isn't a distribution, it's a kernel!"

Well, yeah, but I wasn't going to say that. ;-)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beating_a_dead_horse

Sometimes it's fun to do so, though. :-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 19 Aug 2008 17:44:48
Message: <48ab3ed0$1@news.povray.org>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:02:09 +0300, Eero Ahonen wrote:

> Flamewar! Flamewar!

Can you have a flamewar when there is essentially violent agreement on 
something? ;-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 19 Aug 2008 18:00:13
Message: <48ab426d@news.povray.org>
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:02:09 +0300, Eero Ahonen wrote:
> 
>> Flamewar! Flamewar!
> 
> Can you have a flamewar when there is essentially violent agreement on 
> something? ;-)

F___ you! Of course you can!

http://elbourne.org/sermons/index.mv?illustration+4882

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 19 Aug 2008 18:36:15
Message: <48ab4adf$1@news.povray.org>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:13 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:02:09 +0300, Eero Ahonen wrote:
>> 
>>> Flamewar! Flamewar!
>> 
>> Can you have a flamewar when there is essentially violent agreement on
>> something? ;-)
> 
> F___ you! Of course you can!
> 
> http://elbourne.org/sermons/index.mv?illustration+4882

Oh yeah?  Oh yeah?  OH YEAH?  Well, f**@ that noise!  You're just wrong 
and you know it!  D@mned trolls. ;-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 20 Aug 2008 10:17:26
Message: <48ac2776@news.povray.org>
Jim Henderson wrote:
> 
> Can you have a flamewar when there is essentially violent agreement on 
> something? ;-)

Of course, for example of the way of agreeing. ;-)

> Jim


-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 20 Aug 2008 11:40:05
Message: <48ac3ad5$1@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:17:40 +0300, Eero Ahonen wrote:

>> Can you have a flamewar when there is essentially violent agreement on
>> something? ;-)
> 
> Of course, for example of the way of agreeing. ;-)

I'd have to disagree. ;-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 20 Aug 2008 12:04:46
Message: <48ac409e$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Henderson wrote:
> I'd have to disagree. ;-)

"Dwarves are an argumentive lot. Of course, not all of them would agree 
with that assessment."

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: This is why Windows doesn't need a package manager
Date: 20 Aug 2008 18:35:47
Message: <48ac9c43$1@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:04:46 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I'd have to disagree. ;-)
> 
> "Dwarves are an argumentive lot. Of course, not all of them would agree
> with that assessment."

Oi, I'm not THAT short! ;-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.