 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Look at the first screenshot of task manager. Realize that it's 4 ROWS
of graphs. Read the physical memory amount.
http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/07/21/3092070.aspx
Whatever machine that was running on is a BEAST.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
4 x 16 CPU cores? And all idle?
I want to make babies with this thing... Babies rendered with POV-Ray!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Look at the first screenshot of task manager. Realize that it's 4 ROWS
> of graphs. Read the physical memory amount.
Looks like he is running a prototype version of the next Windows... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> Look at the first screenshot of task manager. Realize that it's 4 ROWS
>> of graphs. Read the physical memory amount.
>
> Looks like he is running a prototype version of the next Windows... ;-)
>
Don't tell me that's the minimum requirements..
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Don't tell me that's the minimum requirements..
No no no, he's only using 4% of the RAM there!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> Don't tell me that's the minimum requirements..
>
> No no no, he's only using 4% of the RAM there!
>
Oh, so ... only about 40GB of RAM, then ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Oh, so ... only about 40GB of RAM, then ...
http://www.poppyfields.net/filks/00160.html
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:4885f9e5$1@news.povray.org...
> scott wrote:
>>> Don't tell me that's the minimum requirements..
>>
>> No no no, he's only using 4% of the RAM there!
>>
>
> Oh, so ... only about 40GB of RAM, then ...
Oh wow, that would be SO nice! See the page-file? OoO
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"scott" <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote in message
news:4885f0f9$1@news.povray.org...
> > Look at the first screenshot of task manager. Realize that it's 4 ROWS
> > of graphs. Read the physical memory amount.
>
> Looks like he is running a prototype version of the next Windows... ;-)
Dunno. I'll have to check tomorrow, but I think that's Windows Server 2008.
The version of windows that's in dev (windows 7) is, afaik, a workstation
version, not a server version.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:4885e8a7$1@news.povray.org...
> Look at the first screenshot of task manager. Realize that it's 4 ROWS
> of graphs. Read the physical memory amount.
>
Nice. Wonder where I can get one of those... <g>
>
> Whatever machine that was running on is a BEAST.
I'm glad the server team's testing out on the really, really big servers.
The last thing you want in a server OS is a subtle bug that only manifests
on servers with lots of CPUs/lots of memory
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
