 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4 Jun 2008 18:09:43 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
Summing up your opinions I bet you're a popular guest at dinner
parties :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:19:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> Summing up your opinions I bet you're a popular guest at dinner parties
Well, for the few that I get invited to, I am. :-) But that's because I
only go to the ones with friends, and my friends tend to hold similar
opinions. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> From what I recall, the Iraqis (or maybe more accurately, Saddam)
> believed they were.
OK, I'll grant you that one. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:06:34 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> From what I recall, the Iraqis (or maybe more accurately, Saddam)
>> believed they were.
>
> OK, I'll grant you that one. :-)
Ah, good, that means my recollection was good. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4 Jun 2008 20:12:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:19:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Summing up your opinions I bet you're a popular guest at dinner parties
>
>Well, for the few that I get invited to, I am. :-) But that's because I
>only go to the ones with friends, and my friends tend to hold similar
>opinions. :-)
>
>Jim
Next time I have a dinner party, you are on the list ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2008 20:12:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:19:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> Summing up your opinions I bet you're a popular guest at dinner parties
>> Well, for the few that I get invited to, I am. :-) But that's because I
>> only go to the ones with friends, and my friends tend to hold similar
>> opinions. :-)
>>
>> Jim
>
> Next time I have a dinner party, you are on the list ;)
Hey, Stephen, let's invite Warp and Andrew as well }:-)
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:16:11 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2008 20:12:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:19:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> Summing up your opinions I bet you're a popular guest at dinner
>>> parties
>>
>>Well, for the few that I get invited to, I am. :-) But that's because I
>>only go to the ones with friends, and my friends tend to hold similar
>>opinions. :-)
>>
>>Jim
>
> Next time I have a dinner party, you are on the list ;)
Should be fun, hopefully I'll be in the country when it happens. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:22:50 +0100, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
>
>Hey, Stephen, let's invite Warp and Andrew as well }:-)
Why not? There are quite a few from this ng I'd like to invite ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5 Jun 2008 12:42:09 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Next time I have a dinner party, you are on the list ;)
>
>Should be fun, hopefully I'll be in the country when it happens. :-)
>
Next time you are here we'll have an Int PovCon at least :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
>
>>Recently when RETURNING to Canada, (that would be the country of my
>>citizenship,) from the US, I had to endure a close screening by a crew
>>of smarmy homeland security agents. My mistake was that I was riding on
>>a bus rather than in a car. Now, while I consider it invasive, I can
>>understand that these freaks feel the need to monitor who is crossing
>>the border in either direction. But the complexion of the 'interview'
>>was that I somehow had to meet the approval of these American agents,
>>before I would be allowed to return to my own country.
>
>
> Well, it makes sense. We can never know what those Canadians are up to.
> Ever seen the South Park movie?
>
True, it's probably better for all concerned to just keep them out of
their country.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
