 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
WTF?
Lots and lots of Indiana Jones-ness. Not a whole lot of making
sense-ness. Like... what was in that box they were looking for at the
beginning?
(Note the careful avoidance of spoilers.)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 26 May 2008 20:38:00 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Lots and lots of Indiana Jones-ness. Not a whole lot of making
> sense-ness.
IJ and making sense? ;-) I agree, lots of "WTF?" but in the end, it
actually managed to maintain the feel of the earlier films.
> Like... what was in that box they were looking for at the
> beginning?
I could tell you, but that'd be a spoiler. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> IJ and making sense? ;-) I agree, lots of "WTF?" but in the end, it
> actually managed to maintain the feel of the earlier films.
I agree. It was exceedingly Indiana Jones in the action sequences.
Everything else was just weird.
>> Like... what was in that box they were looking for at the
>> beginning?
>
> I could tell you, but that'd be a spoiler. ;-)
I just came back from it. (I mean, email me directly with spoilers.)
I mean, when they took it out of the box, it made sense at that point.
Explain to me how it could have wound up where it was after they took it
out of the box.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> It didn't. It was another.
Taking it private, since we're getting into spoiler land.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote in message
news:483b85fe$1@news.povray.org...
> Jim Henderson wrote:
> > IJ and making sense? ;-) I agree, lots of "WTF?" but in the end, it
> > actually managed to maintain the feel of the earlier films.
>
> I agree. It was exceedingly Indiana Jones in the action sequences.
> Everything else was just weird.
I dunno. I really liked it and the story made (mostly) sense to me
> I just came back from it. (I mean, email me directly with spoilers.)
>
> I mean, when they took it out of the box, it made sense at that point.
> Explain to me how it could have wound up where it was after they took it
> out of the box.
It didn't. It was another. The one in the box was a later arrival. Whereas
the original was where it was found for hundreds of years
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> It didn't. It was another. The one in the box was a later arrival.
Fair enough. So they had two, one for the good guys, one for the bad
guys. Why a big fight? :-)
OK, maybe, given this, I'll think about it some more and it might make
more sense. But yah, that makes more sense.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> "Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
> news:483b85fe$1@news.povray.org...
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> IJ and making sense? ;-) I agree, lots of "WTF?" but in the end, it
>>> actually managed to maintain the feel of the earlier films.
>> I agree. It was exceedingly Indiana Jones in the action sequences.
>> Everything else was just weird.
>
> I dunno. I really liked it and the story made (mostly) sense to me
>
>> I just came back from it. (I mean, email me directly with spoilers.)
>>
>> I mean, when they took it out of the box, it made sense at that point.
>> Explain to me how it could have wound up where it was after they took it
>> out of the box.
>
> It didn't. It was another. The one in the box was a later arrival. Whereas
> the original was where it was found for hundreds of years
>
>
Dammit. Now I'm going to have to see the movie just to see wtf you're
all talking about
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Doctor John wrote:
> Dammit. Now I'm going to have to see the movie just to see wtf you're
> all talking about
Seconded.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:483b925a$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
> > It didn't. It was another. The one in the box was a later arrival.
>
> Fair enough. So they had two, one for the good guys, one for the bad
> guys. Why a big fight? :-)
Because the old one was the one that had to be returned.
Did you get my mail?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:483c15df$1@news.povray.org...
> Dammit. Now I'm going to have to see the movie just to see wtf you're
> all talking about
>
Hehehe.
Seriously, go see it. It's good fun.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
