 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote in message
news:483b925a$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
> > It didn't. It was another. The one in the box was a later arrival.
>
> Fair enough. So they had two, one for the good guys, one for the bad
> guys. Why a big fight? :-)
Because the old one was the one that had to be returned.
Did you get my mail?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:483c15df$1@news.povray.org...
> Dammit. Now I'm going to have to see the movie just to see wtf you're
> all talking about
>
Hehehe.
Seriously, go see it. It's good fun.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 26 May 2008 20:54:38 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> IJ and making sense? ;-) I agree, lots of "WTF?" but in the end, it
>> actually managed to maintain the feel of the earlier films.
>
> I agree. It was exceedingly Indiana Jones in the action sequences.
> Everything else was just weird.
Yeah, agreed. But overall I did like it.
>>> Like... what was in that box they were looking for at the beginning?
>>
>> I could tell you, but that'd be a spoiler. ;-)
>
> I just came back from it. (I mean, email me directly with spoilers.)
>
> I mean, when they took it out of the box, it made sense at that point.
> Explain to me how it could have wound up where it was after they took it
> out of the box.
I suppose we could start a spoiler thread so people would know to ignore
it. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> Because the old one was the one that had to be returned.
> Did you get my mail?
OK. (Yah, it went in the bit bucket.) Still outstanding questions, but
good enough.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Seconded.
Maybe you should take a girl with you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Attwood wrote:
>> Seconded.
>
> Maybe you should take a girl with you.
>
>
How's Cute QA girl doing?
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Seconded.
>
> Maybe you should take a girl with you.
Oh yeah, because that's highly probable. :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:19:35 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>
did spake, saying:
>>> Seconded.
>> Maybe you should take a girl with you.
>
> Oh yeah, because that's highly probable. :-P
What, I'm sure your sister would love to see it.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Oh yeah, because that's highly probable. :-P
>
> What, I'm sure your sister would love to see it.
Clearly you've never been to Singapore...
Er, I mean... Clearly you don't know my sister very well.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:36:08 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
>>> Oh yeah, because that's highly probable. :-P
>> What, I'm sure your sister would love to see it.
>
> Clearly you've never been to Singapore...
>
> Er, I mean... Clearly you don't know my sister very well.
Not an Indy fan, gosh you do have strange ones in your family ;-)
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
