 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow, this tower is described as a 'full' tower and it's 62cm high!
http://www.cqout.com/item.asp?id=3227479
Never seen one in any high street shop around this one horse town...
:o/
Can you see out of your window with these?? ;)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> No need for onboard LAN, video or sound. I'm buying or have seperate cards
> for those.
Do you have a particular reason for NOT to use onboard LAN? Video I
understand - sound..yes, but why not LAN?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Severi Salminen" <sev### [at] NOT THISsaunalahtifiinvalid> wrote in
message news:47dd96c9$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> > No need for onboard LAN, video or sound. I'm buying or have seperate
cards
> > for those.
>
> Do you have a particular reason for NOT to use onboard LAN? Video I
> understand - sound..yes, but why not LAN?
Got a wireless network card I'll be using.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:47dd8700$1@news.povray.org...
> Wow, this tower is described as a 'full' tower and it's 62cm high!
> http://www.cqout.com/item.asp?id=3227479
That's huge.
Maybe it's a difference in terminology, around here the 42 cm high cases are
refered to as full towers, and that's what I have.
These are kinda what I'm going for.
http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=311&catId=20
http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=309&catId=20
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:48:48 +0100, Gail Shaw sa dot com>
<"<initialsurname"@sentech> wrote:
> These are kinda what I'm going for.
> http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=311&catId=20
> http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=309&catId=20
Those are both good cases, especially the first one.
Personally though, I would recommend one of these:
http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=312&catId=20
http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=317&catId=22
Less bling and more function.
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> Got a wireless network card I'll be using.
Isn't that wildly insecure / unreliable?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Don't underestimate the power of Gail Shaw...
> I'm busy specing up a new PC. I'm having trouble picking a motherboard
> though, any advice?
>
> Processor = Intel Core-2 Quad, 2.66
>
> The board must support at least 4 GB of DDR2 800 memory.
> Must have at least 4 SATA-2 ports. No RAID requirements
> Must have at least 6, preferably more, USB-2 ports
> No need for onboard LAN, video or sound. I'm buying or have seperate cards
> for those.
>
Asus P5E (*not* P5E3 !)
< http://tinyurl.com/27hfke >
Slawek
--
\__ \__ \_______________________________________________________________
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:38:38 -0000, Gail Shaw sa dot com>
<"<initialsurname"@sentech> did spake, saying:
>
> "Severi Salminen" <sev### [at] NOTTHISsaunalahtifiinvalid> wrot
e
> in
> message news:47dd96c9$1@news.povray.org...
>> Gail Shaw wrote:
>>
>> > No need for onboard LAN, video or sound. I'm buying or have seperat
e
>> cards for those.
>>
>> Do you have a particular reason for NOT to use onboard LAN? Video I
>> understand - sound..yes, but why not LAN?
>
> Got a wireless network card I'll be using.
I know Asus does motherboards with built in WiFi tum-ti-tum ah here we g
o
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/asus_p5b/
>> Processor = Intel Core-2 Quad, 2.66
Check (confirmed elsewhere)
>> The board must support at least 4 GB of DDR2 800 memory.
8Gb DDR2 800
>> Must have at least 4 SATA-2 ports. No RAID requirements
6 SATA 3.0Gb
>> Must have at least 6, preferably more, USB-2 ports
8
Might save you a slot with built-in WiFi.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:47de3953$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> > Got a wireless network card I'll be using.
>
> Isn't that wildly insecure
Not when Mac address filtered and with a network key. Besides, it's a home
network, not a corporate.
> / unreliable?
Never noticed so. Much better than cables running all over the place. It's
for a flat of 3 rooms, so I don't need excessive range
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Fredrik Eriksson" <fe79}--at--{yahoo}--dot--{com> wrote in message
news:op.t75ireku7bxctx@e6600...
> Personally though, I would recommend one of these:
> http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=312&catId=20
> http://www.pclabs.co.za/ProductDetail.aspx?prodId=317&catId=22
>
> Less bling and more function.
But I like the bling. *g*
Seriously, the second one looks nice. Very nice.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
