 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguy com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > The amount of interesting detail in this photo is staggering.
> I bet they spent *years* modeling it :)
Yeah. 1:1 scale models. ;)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> Ok, I missed the caption, but looking at all the females there, yes,
> they all have short hair styled like a man's, except for the blond girl to
> the right behind the boy holding the gun. Is that another girl possibly
> sitting on a chair?
"Levicy Emma Hatfield (daughter of Cap)", says the caption.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:47d2c84a@news.povray.org...
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/HatfieldClan.jpg
Look at the Dovetails on that wooden structure behind them.
Brilliant! Ask a carpenter to copy that now, (in that scale) and he'll
give you a competitive quote... ;)
~Steve~
> - Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
>> Warp wrote:
>>> The amount of interesting detail in this photo is staggering.
>> I bet they spent *years* modeling it :)
> Yeah. 1:1 scale models. ;)
LOL. Standing in a Cornell box?
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:09:30 -0500, Warp wrote:
> I apologize for the more blog-style posting, but...
...you don't have a blog? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:09:30 -0500, Warp wrote:
> > I apologize for the more blog-style posting, but...
> ...you don't have a blog? ;-)
Not really. I have a rant page, but that's about it.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
47d2e02b$1@news.povray.org...
> Warp wrote:
>> The amount of interesting detail in this photo is staggering.
>
> I bet they spent *years* modeling it :)
and a submarine spent few hours demodeling it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Lusitania
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:22:22 -0500, Warp wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:09:30 -0500, Warp wrote:
>
>> > I apologize for the more blog-style posting, but...
>
>> ...you don't have a blog? ;-)
>
> Not really. I have a rant page, but that's about it.
Maybe you need a blog, then. ;-)
<scnr>
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
> news:47d2c84a@news.povray.org...
>> Somehow I find some old photographs to be really fascinating. The older
>> the photograph, the more fascinating. For example, consider this
>> photograph
>> taken in 1897:
>>
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/HatfieldClan.jpg
> You're not kidding. I love these photo's too, but did you notice the boy
> wearing a dress, (left, top row)? And is that, (shall we say), a 'short'
> blond haired lady to the right? It makes you think about what the mindset of
> these people was like back then. Hard times indeed.
The most distracting thing in these old photos is that you never see
anyone smiling. Hard time indeed. Either that or "cheeeese!" was still
to be invented. :)
and to think Buster Keaton and Charles Chaplin were just a few years away...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> St. wrote:
>> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
>> news:47d2c84a@news.povray.org...
>>> Somehow I find some old photographs to be really fascinating. The older
>>> the photograph, the more fascinating. For example, consider this
>>> photograph
>>> taken in 1897:
>>>
>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/HatfieldClan.jpg
>> You're not kidding. I love these photo's too, but did you notice
>> the boy wearing a dress, (left, top row)? And is that, (shall we say),
>> a 'short' blond haired lady to the right? It makes you think about
>> what the mindset of these people was like back then. Hard times indeed.
>
> The most distracting thing in these old photos is that you never see
> anyone smiling. Hard time indeed. Either that or "cheeeese!" was still
> to be invented. :)
>
> and to think Buster Keaton and Charles Chaplin were just a few years
> away...
You try standing still for 5 hours, waiting for the film to be
completely exposed (or whatever the term was), and see if you can smile
the whole time ;)
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
