 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.xkcd.com/387/
OK, so just what *exactly* is he looking at here?
(BTW, I always thought girls are cool for exactly this reason, among
many others...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> (BTW, I always thought girls are *cool* for exactly this reason, among
> many others...)
>
You surely meant 'hot'?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:07:35 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>OK, so just what *exactly* is he looking at here?
Loneliness
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>> OK, so just what *exactly* is he looking at here?
>
> Loneliness
Hahahah! You could be right there...
BTW, I love the comments in the forum from guys saying "I just tried
this, and it's the worst chatup line EVER!" Like, wow, some people are
*way* more brave than me! ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:26:02 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>>> OK, so just what *exactly* is he looking at here?
>>
>> Loneliness
>
Or a fast approaching fist.
>Hahahah! You could be right there...
>
or wrong see below :)
>BTW, I love the comments in the forum from guys saying "I just tried
>this, and it's the worst chatup line EVER!" Like, wow, some people are
>*way* more brave than me! ;-)
I've not read the forums but I know that some people will believe anything.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> http://www.xkcd.com/387/
> OK, so just what *exactly* is he looking at here?
I can certainly understand that being an anti-social computer nerd (don't
worry, I'm one of those too) you might not be completely acquainted with
the finest details of human biology, but come on... Give me a break.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> I can certainly understand that being an anti-social computer nerd (don't
> worry, I'm one of those too) you might not be completely acquainted with
> the finest details of human biology, but come on... Give me a break.
Warp, in case you missed it... I was being humourous. :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp escribió:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> http://www.xkcd.com/387/
>
>> OK, so just what *exactly* is he looking at here?
>
> I can certainly understand that being an anti-social computer nerd (don't
> worry, I'm one of those too) you might not be completely acquainted with
> the finest details of human biology, but come on... Give me a break.
>
I think he meant more like... Is he looking at her private parts, or
just at her abdomen where the uterus is, or where? The drawing doesn't
exactly make that very clear.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:48:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> I've not read the forums but I know that some people will believe
> anything.
Did you know the word 'gullible' is not in any dictionary?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > I can certainly understand that being an anti-social computer nerd (don't
> > worry, I'm one of those too) you might not be completely acquainted with
> > the finest details of human biology, but come on... Give me a break.
> Warp, in case you missed it... I was being humourous. :-P
Me too.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
