POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : was Andrew abducted? Server Time
11 Oct 2024 01:21:25 EDT (-0400)
  was Andrew abducted? (Message 58 to 67 of 67)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 04:50:15
Message: <l8iqr3t86su8d8iguo58894er1k18craqq@4ax.com>
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:32:24 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:


>     It is! And you should meet us there too. In London somewhere, (not sure 
>when or where yet, but I'll be staying at my Sister's place in London, and 
>then I'm gonna sneak out and meet Stephen for a few hours or four, or five, 
>or...  ;)
>
>    Ah, just come and meet us, we don't bite do we Stephen? ;)
>
Not with my teeth, I can give a nasty suck though :)

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 04:52:10
Message: <ediqr3difh4f9p4vv3f1r9oaf9v8faam81@4ax.com>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:59:19 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>>> AKA "Satan's layby" (Bill Bailey)
>>
>> From QI or somewhere else?  (I seem to remember that being on QI)
>
>Might well have been, you know how I pick these things up.
>
That's what antibiotics are for :)

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 05:16:32
Message: <47bd4f80$1@news.povray.org>
>> Might well have been, you know how I pick these things up.
>>
> That's what antibiotics are for :)

*rimshot*

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 06:04:01
Message: <47bd5aa1@news.povray.org>
Phil Cook wrote:
> And lo on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:44:11 -0000, Jim Henderson 
> <nos### [at] nospamcom> did spake, saying:
> 
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:37:58 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:
>>
>>> And lo on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:40:55 -0000, Jim Henderson
>>> <nos### [at] nospamcom> did spake, saying:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:11:49 -0300, nemesis wrote:
>>>> No, he's from Milton Keynes, IIRC.
>>>
>>> AKA "Satan's layby" (Bill Bailey)
>>
>> From QI or somewhere else?  (I seem to remember that being on QI)
> 
> Might well have been, you know how I pick these things up.

I think he might have used that somewhere else too, but he does like to 
give his better short jokes good mileage!


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 06:47:52
Message: <b6pqr35lc9lfu6569k0klomn3baash3j9j@4ax.com>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:47:14 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>>> It's a real song, BTW. (And a damn fine one...)
>> 
>> Oh! Lost on me, as is anything from the last 30 years :)
>
>Heh. It's only 10 years old.
>
>Wait... OMG, I'M OLD! o_O
>
>It seems like only yesterday this album was in the top 10... :-{

I do remember "Yesterday" 

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: nemesis
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 07:15:25
Message: <47bd6b5d$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:47:14 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> 
>>>> It's a real song, BTW. (And a damn fine one...)
>>> Oh! Lost on me, as is anything from the last 30 years :)
>> Heh. It's only 10 years old.
>>
>> Wait... OMG, I'M OLD! o_O
>>
>> It seems like only yesterday this album was in the top 10... :-{
> 
> I do remember "Yesterday" 

oh please.  We're living in the Information Age where almost all human 
works in the last 4 millenia are in some form or another available in a 
few clicks to anyone with internet connection...

yesterday is from yesterday, comparatively...


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 07:21:48
Message: <66rqr35mkal52upjed397naqjjg3q80i76@4ax.com>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:15:48 -0300, nemesis <nam### [at] nospamgmailcom>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:47:14 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> It's a real song, BTW. (And a damn fine one...)
>>>> Oh! Lost on me, as is anything from the last 30 years :)
>>> Heh. It's only 10 years old.
>>>
>>> Wait... OMG, I'M OLD! o_O
>>>
>>> It seems like only yesterday this album was in the top 10... :-{
>> 
>> I do remember "Yesterday" 
>
>oh please.  We're living in the Information Age where almost all human 
>works in the last 4 millenia are in some form or another available in a 
>few clicks to anyone with internet connection...
>
>yesterday is from yesterday, comparatively...

Subtext nEMESIS, subtext. There is more than one story here. And yes some people
call it the Information Age but since the *.age changes ever time you look. Who
cares, What? What!

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 11:03:14
Message: <op.t6vtjpv8c3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:52:04 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
did spake, saying:

> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:59:19 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>
>>>> AKA "Satan's layby" (Bill Bailey)
>>>
>>> From QI or somewhere else?  (I seem to remember that being on QI)
>>
>> Might well have been, you know how I pick these things up.
>>
> That's what antibiotics are for :)

Pah new fangling things; there's nowt that can't be fixed with a good dose  
of creosote. :-)

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 11:53:56
Message: <47bdaca4$1@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:59:19 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:

>>> AKA "Satan's layby" (Bill Bailey)
>>
>> From QI or somewhere else?  (I seem to remember that being on QI)
> 
> Might well have been, you know how I pick these things up.

True....  It just sounds really familiar, and most of the Bill Bailey 
I've seen was his appearances on QI. :-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: was Andrew abducted?
Date: 21 Feb 2008 15:51:13
Message: <51prr3prse7f2rtvivq32mh6f9bt0okle1@4ax.com>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:03:15 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>
>Pah new fangling things; there's nowt that can't be fixed with a good dose  
>of creosote. :-)

And an umbrella :)

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.