 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote:
>> But Yahoo? To me it doesn't have such an image as eg. Google has.
>
> speaking of image, Yahoo has Flickr, which in my book is one of the best online
> apps ever. It pleases the eyes very much and my daughter loves searching for
> doll photos...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/knasclass/2249652433/in/pool-microsoft-keep-your-evil-grubby-hands-off-our-flickr
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
> > Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> >> But Yahoo? To me it doesn't have such an image as eg. Google has.
> >
> > speaking of image, Yahoo has Flickr, which in my book is one of the best online
> > apps ever. It pleases the eyes very much and my daughter loves searching for
> > doll photos...
>
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/knasclass/2249652433/in/pool-microsoft-keep-your-evil-grubby-hands-off-our-flickr
LOL! lots of sensible people there, no doubt! ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>>> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>>>> But Yahoo? To me it doesn't have such an image as eg. Google has.
>>> speaking of image, Yahoo has Flickr, which in my book is one of the best online
>>> apps ever. It pleases the eyes very much and my daughter loves searching for
>>> doll photos...
>>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/knasclass/2249652433/in/pool-microsoft-keep-your-evil-grubby-hands-off-our-flickr
>
> LOL! lots of sensible people there, no doubt! ;)
Oops wrong link. I wanted to link to the whole group:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/microsoft-keep-your-evil-grubby-hands-off-our-flickr/pool/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>>>> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>>>>> But Yahoo? To me it doesn't have such an image as eg. Google has.
>>>> speaking of image, Yahoo has Flickr, which in my book is one of the
>>>> best online
>>>> apps ever. It pleases the eyes very much and my daughter loves
>>>> searching for
>>>> doll photos...
>>>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/knasclass/2249652433/in/pool-microsoft-keep-your-evil-grubby-hands-off-our-flickr
>>>
>>
>> LOL! lots of sensible people there, no doubt! ;)
>
> Oops wrong link. I wanted to link to the whole group:
>
http://www.flickr.com/groups/microsoft-keep-your-evil-grubby-hands-off-our-flickr/pool/
>
Been wondering what would come of flickr if MS's deal to purchase Yahoo
goes through. Hmmm.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Been wondering what would come of flickr if MS's deal to purchase Yahoo
> goes through. Hmmm.
"What are we likely to see as the result of the Microsoft-Yahoo takeover?"
http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=3370651
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> As you maight know for $us. 44.6 Billions. I think Yahoo should stay in
>> bussiness what do you think?
>
> Who cares?
Well, me for instance, and I don't have a yahoo free e-mail account but
millions of people do, and competition among free e-mail suppliers is
good for quality service. Why you think Yahoo!, AIM, Hotmail and others
have now huge Inboxes (about 5 GB) and a year or 2 ago was only about
5MB? I think is worth it that yahoo! keeps walking by itself.
> I would wholeheartedly agree if it was Google instead of Yahoo (and,
> in fact, MS *has* tried buying Google, which refused).
>
> But Yahoo? To me it doesn't have such an image as eg. Google has.
I know Google is the best thing on the Internet for what Google does,
(Internet and Office tools) but Yahoo! is good enough to stay on The
Net, IMO.
>
> If MS tried to buy the Free Software Foundation, that would be interesting.
That is MS & Bill Gates wet dream, dooms day for MS competition at the
best price possible (free).
> I hate to defend Windows by principle, but I can't simply deny facts:
> The need for security patches is not a flaw exclusive to Windows, nor one
> can fairly expect an OS of that size to be completely flawless. The Linux
> kernel receives regular security patches, and this is true for most other
> OSes as well (such as Solaris and MacOS X).
>
> What MS should do is to make their OS more efficient, lighter and with
> increased usability.
I agree completely, the only improvements MS does on their Windows OS
are on the next version they don't really add new functions or improve
the current ones, except maybe for SP2 of WinXP.
They like to plagiate ideas from MacOS X, but they
> fail to replicate its user-friendliness and robustness.
>
I know security patches even apply to software like FireFox, Seamonkey,
Adobe Acrobat Reader and other but I think MS is overdue on this aspect.
For example did you know that Messenger service must be disabled as a
security practice? Service like in Windows' Service, not the application
itself.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> MS has lots of money to pay very clever people with lots of experience
> to help decide their strategy - you think you can make MS more
> profitable than they can?
Yes in fact I do, at least I'd doa better job than you since at the
seems all you can think of is in a bunch of absurd and exaggerated ideas
that can be confused with retarded ones. Try to give some more matures
opinions would you?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Saul Luizaga wrote:
>> As you maight know for $us. 44.6 Billions. I think Yahoo should stay
>> in bussiness what do you think?
>
> Yahoo is still going?
>
> Oh well, no loss...
>
Well actually I think indirectly we all loose if Yahoo! call it quits.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
somebody wrote:
> "Saul Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote
>
>> As you maight know for $us. 44.6 Billions. I think Yahoo should stay in
>> bussiness what do you think?
>>
>> I think they're doing fine and is not the money exclusively, is about a
>> philanthropy/philosophy for service for the humanity,
>
> What are you smoking?
>
>
What do you have for brains? can you think in something better to write?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> > If MS tried to buy the Free Software Foundation, that would be interesting.
>
> That is MS & Bill Gates wet dream, dooms day for MS competition at the
> best price possible (free).
That would only mean Bill'd be the copyright owner of several important GPL
projects. Unfortunately for him, said copyright specifically grants the right
to others to copy and change the software the license covers. If that day ever
happened, day 2 would see some thousands of forks for said software...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
