On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:12:32 -0500, nemesis wrote:

> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:06:58 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>
>> > Jim Henderson wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Or Ghost Busters?
>> >>
>> >> Oh, now, Ghostbusters is a great movie!
>> >
>> > Yes. But not because of his character.
>>
>> Well, I'd have to say that without Murray, the film wouldn't have been
>> the same....<g>
> 
> Definitely!  Have you seen "What about Bob?"?  It's the film he worked
> on just before Groundhog.  By Frank Oz and with Richard Dreyfuss playing
> Bill's psychiatrist.  Very fun movie as well. :D

I haven't seen that one - going to have to rent it at some point. :-)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_About_Bob%3F
> 
> seems Spielberg liked Murray's performance so much that started a
> campaign to get him an Oscar nomination...
> 
> BTW, Murray is also the voice of Garfield in the movies...
> 
> you can't go wrong with Dr. Pete Venckman or Garfield! :))

:-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53:59 -0800, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>> 
>>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
>> 
>> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
> 
> They're more curves than angles, methinks.

LOL, yes, true - but "Charley's Curves" doesn't have the same ring to 
it. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> 
> HE'S been raytracing too long? *I* had to reread it 6 times to figure
> out the difference... o_O
> 

Hah! I found it on third read.

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
   http://www.zbxt.net
      aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0600, Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> 
>> You haven't seen the movie, have you?

Nope, I haven't. I guess I'll have to see, it starts to seem interesting.

> It is showing tomorrow :)

A) In another part of the world.

B) I don't have a television.

> Regards
> 	Stephen


-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
   http://www.zbxt.net
      aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:45:42 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0600, Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> 
>>> You haven't seen the movie, have you?
>
>Nope, I haven't. I guess I'll have to see, it starts to seem interesting.
>
>> It is showing tomorrow :)
>
>A) In another part of the world.

No near you tomorrow :)

>B) I don't have a television.

You don't need one :)

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
>> A) In another part of the world.
> 
> No near you tomorrow :)
> 
>> B) I don't have a television.
> 
> You don't need one :)

You'll bring me a DVD? :)

> Regards
> 	Stephen


-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
   http://www.zbxt.net
      aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:36:25 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>>> A) In another part of the world.
>> 
>> No near you tomorrow :)
>> 
>>> B) I don't have a television.
>> 
>> You don't need one :)
>
>You'll bring me a DVD? :)
>

No, better than that. I'll show you tomorrow. :)


Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> 
> No, better than that. I'll show you tomorrow. :)

Tomorrow's gone :p.

> 
> Regards
> 	Stephen


-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
   http://www.zbxt.net
      aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> >
> > No, better than that. I'll show you tomorrow. :)
>
> Tomorrow's gone :p.

watch the movie.

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> >
> > No, better than that. I'll show you tomorrow. :)
>
> Tomorrow's gone :p.
>
> >

I'll show you tomorrow. :)

Post a reply to this message