 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>
>> Or Ghost Busters?
>
> Seriously? The second one sort of sucked, but the original was great!
The second one *did* suck.
The first one was pretty neat - just not because of that particular
character.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes. But not because of his character.
> >
>
> How could you not love a character that would say this:
>
> "Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria."
>
> I mean, come on :) where's the love?
How about: "Morons! Your bus is leaving!" :)
I find it hard to believe someone has issues with such cynical but loveable
characters Murray come up with. Many of his lines are improvised, BTW...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:12:32 -0500, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:06:58 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>
>> > Jim Henderson wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Or Ghost Busters?
>> >>
>> >> Oh, now, Ghostbusters is a great movie!
>> >
>> > Yes. But not because of his character.
>>
>> Well, I'd have to say that without Murray, the film wouldn't have been
>> the same....<g>
>
> Definitely! Have you seen "What about Bob?"? It's the film he worked
> on just before Groundhog. By Frank Oz and with Richard Dreyfuss playing
> Bill's psychiatrist. Very fun movie as well. :D
I haven't seen that one - going to have to rent it at some point. :-)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_About_Bob%3F
>
> seems Spielberg liked Murray's performance so much that started a
> campaign to get him an Oscar nomination...
>
> BTW, Murray is also the voice of Garfield in the movies...
>
> you can't go wrong with Dr. Pete Venckman or Garfield! :))
:-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53:59 -0800, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>
>>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
>>
>> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
>
> They're more curves than angles, methinks.
LOL, yes, true - but "Charley's Curves" doesn't have the same ring to
it. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>
> HE'S been raytracing too long? *I* had to reread it 6 times to figure
> out the difference... o_O
>
Hah! I found it on third read.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0600, Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
>> You haven't seen the movie, have you?
Nope, I haven't. I guess I'll have to see, it starts to seem interesting.
> It is showing tomorrow :)
A) In another part of the world.
B) I don't have a television.
> Regards
> Stephen
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:45:42 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0600, Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>
>>> You haven't seen the movie, have you?
>
>Nope, I haven't. I guess I'll have to see, it starts to seem interesting.
>
>> It is showing tomorrow :)
>
>A) In another part of the world.
No near you tomorrow :)
>B) I don't have a television.
You don't need one :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>> A) In another part of the world.
>
> No near you tomorrow :)
>
>> B) I don't have a television.
>
> You don't need one :)
You'll bring me a DVD? :)
> Regards
> Stephen
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:36:25 +0200, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>>> A) In another part of the world.
>>
>> No near you tomorrow :)
>>
>>> B) I don't have a television.
>>
>> You don't need one :)
>
>You'll bring me a DVD? :)
>
No, better than that. I'll show you tomorrow. :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> No, better than that. I'll show you tomorrow. :)
Tomorrow's gone :p.
>
> Regards
> Stephen
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
