 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson escribió:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>
>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
>
> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
Because you have been raytracing for too long.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Jim Henderson escribió:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>
>>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
>>
>> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
>
> Because you have been raytracing for too long.
HE'S been raytracing too long? *I* had to reread it 6 times to figure
out the difference... o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Or Ghost Busters?
>
> Oh, now, Ghostbusters is a great movie!
Yes. But not because of his character.
Ghostbusters II - Not Good(tm)...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
Have you seen "Broken Flowers"?
> Or Ghost Busters?
yes, it's a fun classic. The first one, I mean.
of course, everyone has their lows in life and careers...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
> >> Or Ghost Busters?
> >
> > Oh, now, Ghostbusters is a great movie!
>
> Yes. But not because of his character.
I see you don't like cynicism. too bad...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism#Toward_modern_cynicism
Bill somehow is a loved figure, despite all the cynicism his characters ooze.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> > Jim Henderson escribió:
> >> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
> >>
> >> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
> >
> > Because you have been raytracing for too long.
>
> HE'S been raytracing too long? *I* had to reread it 6 times to figure
> out the difference... o_O
perhaps you guys got your eyes prejudiced for raytracing too long. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
47a58aa0$1@news.povray.org...
> Groundhog day.
I got you babe...
MArc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
47a6d83c$1@news.povray.org...
> Groundhog day.
I got you babe....
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
web.47a78f5eb9e9725cfba9d8b70@news.povray.org...
>
> perhaps you guys got your eyes prejudiced for raytracing too long. ;)
>
Let's sue the POV-team :-p
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
M_a_r_c escribió:
> "nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> a �crit dans le message de news:
> web.47a78f5eb9e9725cfba9d8b70@news.povray.org...
>> perhaps you guys got your eyes prejudiced for raytracing too long. ;)
>>
> Let's sue the POV-team :-p
Hey, careful with that. People would confuse you with an idiot American.
(I added the adjective to make it clear not all Americans sue for
nothing, just the idiot ones)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
