 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Also interesting, this commercial for the beer Miller Lite
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EUGhnQ8Cjk
>
> you know, I really hate youtube. If you don't have a Flash player, you get
> squat, not even some hidden link to the video somewhere in the html.
>
http://stuff.povaddict.com.ar/youtube.php?video_id=9EUGhnQ8Cjk
I had to tweak the regex a bit before posting, seems they changed things
on the site...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:05:33 -0500, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:57:37 -0500, nemesis wrote:
>>
>> > hmm, isn't that true? :D
>> >
>> > Kings were toothpaste!
>>
>> Religion = beer. :)
>
> I thought Religion = opium... ;)
Well, possibly; I was just going with the items that were listed. :-)
Mmmmm, beer....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> A Bryce user recreated my Wet Bird image from scratch:
> http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/...
From the link:
> Some time ago I came across a photo on Google that I loved and
> thought it would make a great project to try and recreate the
> scene in Bryce. A few days into working on it I visited the web
> site on the image and was amazed to find that it wasn't a photo at
> all but CG made in Povray.
That guy is a d*ck. Neither "wasn't a photo" nor "cg" nor "made in
Povray" is completely accurate. This isn't a criticism of your picture
(you are very clear about the methods used on your site), but of
johnyf's inference that he "recreat(ed) the scene in Bryce."
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay <sha### [at] nonenone> wrote:
> Gilles Tran wrote:
> > A Bryce user recreated my Wet Bird image from scratch:
> > http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/...
>
> From the link:
> > Some time ago I came across a photo on Google that I loved and
> > thought it would make a great project to try and recreate the
> > scene in Bryce. A few days into working on it I visited the web
> > site on the image and was amazed to find that it wasn't a photo at
> > all but CG made in Povray.
>
> That guy is a d*ck. Neither "wasn't a photo" nor "cg" nor "made in
> Povray" is completely accurate.
what's the problem with the guy's description of how it happened? That work can
indeed be thought to be a photo. And it is in fact Computer Graphics. Rendered
with Povray. What exactly is wrong?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> you know, I really hate youtube.
Check out vixy.net then.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26 Jan 2008 18:20:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>Mmmmm, beer....
Hmmmm, opium :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
> > you know, I really hate youtube.
>
> Check out vixy.net then.
whoa! many thanks, man!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:33:25 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2008 18:20:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>Mmmmm, beer....
>
> Hmmmm, opium :)
I wouldn't know about that, have only had beer (well, and wine, and a few
other boozy beverages).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
>> That guy is a d*ck. Neither "wasn't a photo" nor "cg" nor "made in
>> Povray" is completely accurate.
> what's the problem with the guy's description of how it happened?
> That work can indeed be thought to be a photo. And it is in fact
> Computer Graphics. Rendered with Povray. What exactly is wrong?
The problem with the guy's description is that the parts for which he
can take credit aren't very good.
"wasn't a photo" : much of the detail came from photos
"cg" : only some of it
"MADE in Povray" : only a small portion was MADE in Pov-Ray/Bryce
The trick isn't in downloading models, scanning photos, or modeling a
lamp post. The trick is making it all look good together. Johnyf's
version doesn't look that good. It looks like the wallpaper in a Subway
sandwich shop (if those exist where you live). IMO, for johnyf to let
comments like, "this is (a) ... dense and detailed scene" pass is dishonest.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran <gitran_nospam_@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> A Bryce user recreated my Wet Bird image from scratch:
> http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1604419&member
> Original image http://www.oyonale.com/image.php?lang=en&mode=info&code=464
I like your original much more. That recreation is way too clean, and
objects seem to be out of place (for example the fire hydrant and the
man with the umbrella; in your image they are much more submersive and
look like they indeed *are* in the scene; in the recreation they look
like artificially added props).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
